Teams

HMTC PURPLE

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-13vs CCOC PIERREWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnita Helin / Debbie Neumaier vs Karla Hansen Adkison / Jane Doe6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Saiber Ehrlich / Anne Beblavi vs Paula Henson / Diane Jackson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-13vs HMTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnita Helin / Ellen Laubhan vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Becky Olson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatti Helper / Renee Gerrick vs Mel Fernandez / Eileen Heath6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Neumaier / Priscilla Dressen vs Julie Brown / Nancy Williams6-3, 6-0
2023-09-12vs CCOC PIERREWon 20
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Ellen Laubhan vs Lori McPherson / Diane Jackson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Beblavi / Laura Saiber Ehrlich vs Karla Hansen Adkison / Rona Clark6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-12vs HMTC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatti Helper / Renee Gerrick vs Eileen Heath / Linda Miller6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Helin / Debbie Neumaier vs Jan Keefe / Mel Fernandez6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Debbie Neumaier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Anne Beblavi
published 4
Anita Helin
published 4
3.74
Renee Gerrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Patti Helper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Ellen Laubhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Priscilla Dressen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.13
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Renee Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Dressen + Debbie Neumaier8161% games−2.0% vs expected
Patti Helper + Renee Gerrick4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Neumaier
57W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Anne Beblavi
4W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Anita Helin
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Renee Gerrick
50W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Patti Helper
70W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ellen Laubhan
124W–91L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Priscilla Dressen
92W–113L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
Renee Adams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.