Teams

HMTC ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-13vs HMTC PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Becky Olson vs Anita Helin / Ellen Laubhan4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMel Fernandez / Eileen Heath vs Patti Helper / Renee Gerrick2-6, 1-6
2023-09-13vs CCOC PIERRELost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Kerrigan / Julie Brown vs Karla Hansen Adkison / Lori McPherson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Miller / Becky Olson vs Debbie Pierre / Rona Clark4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Bartley / Jan Keefe vs Diane Jackson / Paula Henson1-6, 4-6
2023-09-12vs CCOC PIERRELost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Linda Miller vs Karla Hansen Adkison / Lori McPherson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJanet Kerrigan / Eileen Heath vs Diane Jackson / Jane Doe1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMel Fernandez / Nancy Williams vs Debbie Pierre / Holly Strack5-7, 2-6
2023-09-12vs HMTC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Heath / Linda Miller vs Patti Helper / Renee Gerrick1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJan Keefe / Mel Fernandez vs Anita Helin / Debbie Neumaier0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Olson / Mary Jane Bartley vs Anne Beblavi / Mary Wilson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Becky Olson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Eileen Heath
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Mel Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jan Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Kerrigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Jane Bartley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Olson + Colleen Muhlbradt3351% games+7.1% vs expected
Eileen Heath + Janet Kerrigan213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jane Bartley + Mel Fernandez213 matchesnot enough data
Mel Fernandez + Colleen Muhlbradt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Becky Olson
22W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Eileen Heath
35W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Mel Fernandez
41W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Jan Keefe
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Kerrigan
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Jane Bartley
31W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.