Teams

WP-G SILVER

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs DTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Christopher Prather vs Kevin Prometheus Trotsky / Zack Peterson7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesChris Brummett vs Fabian Neuenschwander1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHenning Schade / Jonathan Kelly vs Todd Wiebe / Daniel Thomas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTony Gubenko / Fred DeFilippo vs Frank Daidone / Ted Marolt6-2, 7-5
2026-07-07vs WP REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesFred DeFilippo / Matt Landy vs Talwin Filholm / Nick Nyffeler2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChris Brummett vs Michael Minguela6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTony Gubenko / Christopher Prather vs Eric Niemann / Mark Anderson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonathan Kelly / Henning Schade vs Jeffrey Merman / Kevin Merman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-30vs CP GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTony Gubenko / Henning Schade vs Peter Horsch / Cam Weprin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Kelly / Christopher Prather vs Troy Kilen / Jason Ortiz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFred DeFilippo / Fred Stein vs John Endrud / David Worley4-6, 6-7
2026-06-23vs CACM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Tony Gubenko vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / Daniel Gralla6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChris Brummett vs William Espiricueta6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHenning Schade / Fred DeFilippo vs Daniel Sloane / Eric Mayer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Matt Landy vs Jim Steavpack / Douglas Adams2-6, 5-7
2026-06-16vs EM BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Matt Landy vs Seth Turner / Rupert Galvez7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChris Brummett vs Ken Huskey6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Jonathan Kelly vs Mauricio Mejia / Martin Gaeth3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFred DeFilippo / Tony Gubenko vs Adam Davy / Jon Becker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-09vs SKY GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Tony Gubenko vs Brian Dwyer / Ross Goldstein6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Brummett vs Kevin Gallagher6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFred DeFilippo / Matt Landy vs Correy Jones / Craig Mills6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Jonathan Kelly vs John Toaspern / Robert Graham6-2, 7-6
2026-06-02vs CM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Chris Brummett vs Justin Franks / Paul Weissman6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTony Gubenko vs William Dickey7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Fitzgerrell / Zuben Bastani vs Adam Poe / Chris Giblin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFred DeFilippo / Henning Schade vs Matthew Parsons / Lee Johnson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP-G SILVER61181025253
2DCHS RED43121634257
3LTA-A GREEN34131534256
4VCC GOLD2591940267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Brian Fitzgerrell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Christopher Prather
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Chris Brummett
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Tony Gubenko
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Matt Landy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Fred DeFilippo
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Zuben Bastani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jonathan Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Fred Stein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Fitzgerrell + Tony Gubenko7455% games+3.2% vs expected
Tony Gubenko + Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas10459% games+1.7% vs expected
Fred DeFilippo + Fred Stein4548% games+1.6% vs expected
Brian Fitzgerrell + Zuben Bastani7653% games−3.3% vs expected
Tony Gubenko + Zuben Bastani2348% gamesnot enough data
Tony Gubenko + Fred DeFilippo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas
132W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Brian Fitzgerrell
78W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Christopher Prather
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Chris Brummett
16W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Tony Gubenko
105W–69L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Matt Landy
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Fred DeFilippo
12W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Zuben Bastani
24W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Jonathan Kelly
55W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Fred Stein
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.