Teams

DTC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs WP-G SILVERLost 13
L#1 DoublesKevin Prometheus Trotsky / Zack Peterson vs Brian Fitzgerrell / Christopher Prather6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesFabian Neuenschwander vs Chris Brummett6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTodd Wiebe / Daniel Thomas vs Henning Schade / Jonathan Kelly2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrank Daidone / Ted Marolt vs Tony Gubenko / Fred DeFilippo2-6, 5-7
2026-07-07vs EM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesTodd Wiebe / Daniel Thomas vs Adam Davy / Mauricio Mejia6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKevin Prometheus Trotsky vs Ken Huskey6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrank Daidone / Ted Marolt vs Derek Mullins / Beattie Leonard7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvan Pfaff / Dan Smink vs Seth Turner / Olaf Siverson4-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs WP REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesSimon Levy / Daniel Thomas vs Brandon Gardner / Nick Nyffeler7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesZack Peterson vs Michael Minguela7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Pfaff / Todd Wiebe vs Greg Allen / Mark Anderson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Smink / Matt Emmons vs Jeffrey Merman / Kevin Merman6-2, 6-3
2026-06-23vs SKY GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesTodd Wiebe / Kevin Prometheus Trotsky vs Ross Goldstein / Robert Graham6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSimon Levy vs Jeff Hutcheson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Thomas / Ted Marolt vs Craig Mills / John Toaspern6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEvan Pfaff / Jonathan Blackburn vs Joe Casey / Kevin Humphrey6-2, 6-3
2026-06-16vs CP GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesZack Peterson / Kevin Prometheus Trotsky vs Jeff Walters / Peter Horsch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFabian Neuenschwander vs Cam Weprin6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Thomas / Todd Wiebe vs Jason Ortiz / Troy Kilen7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDan Smink / Matt Emmons vs Dave Dombrowski / Brett Beard3-6, 5-7
2026-06-09vs CM REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesZack Peterson / Daniel Thomas vs Justin Franks / Paul Weissman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFrank Daidone / Ted Marolt vs William Dickey / Chris Giblin6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEvan Pfaff / Jonathan Blackburn vs Lee Johnson / Matthew Parsons7-6, 6-0
2026-06-02vs CACM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesZack Peterson / Simon Levy vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / Douglas Adams3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Prometheus Trotsky vs Nic Yorchak5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Blackburn / Ted Marolt vs David Marks / Jim Steavpack6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMatt Emmons / Dan Smink vs William Espiricueta / Eric Mayer2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Daniel Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Simon Levy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Kevin Prometheus Trotsky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Jonathan Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Todd Wiebe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Matt Emmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Zack Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.22
Ted Marolt
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Frank Daidone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Fabian Neuenschwander
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Dan Smink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Evan Pfaff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Blackburn + Evan Pfaff4251% games+3.6% vs expected
Daniel Thomas + Todd Wiebe3551% games−0.1% vs expected
Dan Smink + Matt Emmons3447% games−1.9% vs expected
Ted Marolt + Frank Daidone71148% games−6.2% vs expected
Todd Wiebe + Evan Pfaff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Thomas
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Simon Levy
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Kevin Prometheus Trotsky
11W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Jonathan Blackburn
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Todd Wiebe
42W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Matt Emmons
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Zack Peterson
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Ted Marolt
67W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Frank Daidone
58W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Fabian Neuenschwander
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dan Smink
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Evan Pfaff
59W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.