Teams

CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Hinsdale Cashman Wed 6:30 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 40 & Over WN · WE

18 players · average NTRP 3.95 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesSuzi Winters / Marla Gerard vs Jean Soh / Angela Hanson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / Stephanie Stern vs Elizabeth Quigley / Erica Eisner3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMarla Gerard / Suzi Winters vs Nancy Cushing / Keli Redinger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Cathy Evangelist vs Ann Murtaugh / Colleen Stover4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / Stephanie Stern vs Tracie Wilcox / Molly McGinnis5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMarla Gerard / Shannon Ebner vs Laura Purcell / Dawn Pollack6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / Kelly O'Donnell vs Angela Anglin Weathers / Karen Salter2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Marla Gerard vs Sheila Bondoc / Cara Waddle3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Ozlen Er vs Patti Charman / Ellen Kingsepp2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / Lorraine Wong vs Julie Alexander / Lisa Potash5-7, 3-5
L#1 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Ozlen Er vs Kelly Good / Janet Wolf2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristi Cashman / Kelly O'Donnell vs Kimberly Abbs / Laurie Knutte6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / Ginger Riessen vs Jackie Abbott / Kristine Lonsway6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesCeyda Arslan / Ozlen Er vs Chris Purcell / Nancy Manolis7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / ELIZABETH JONES vs Ali Gerstad / Pamela Leichtling1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&O 4.0W S Barrington Gray Sat 9 $20602049157
2CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Oak Brook TC Lukas Tues 7 $205121312128
3CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Oak Brook TC Knutte Sun 2 $205116819173
4CDTA S 40&O 4.0W MT Bann Meng Tues 6:30 $2542131124197
5CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Tam Corey Sun 11 $2233131128207
6CDTA S 40&O 4.0W River Trails Jasinski Tues 7 $2024101432223
7CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $212491532207
8CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Hinsdale Cashman Wed 6:30 $202491533234
9CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Biltmore Szela Sun 3 $201571738249
10(DROPPED) CDTA S 40&O 4.0W S Barrington Martinez Thurs 7 $20000000
11CDTA S 40&O 4.0W Tam Lund Thurs 7 $220622246281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Ginger Riessen
published 4
3.81
Shannon Ebner
published 4
3.78
Julie Boruff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alexis Hiller
published 4
3.72
Cathy Evangelist
published 4
3.66
Katerina Hickey
published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
published 4
3.62
Christi Cashman
published 4
3.62
Denise Huth
published 4
3.61
Marla Gerard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lorraine Wong
published
3.57
Ozlen Er
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Ceyda Arslan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Janelle Goins
published
3.40
ELIZABETH JONES
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kara Levin
published
Kelly O'Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Suzi Winters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Gerard + Ceyda Arslan5255% games+13.8% vs expected
Debbie Skowron + Katerina Hickey4258% games+13.7% vs expected
Julie Boruff + Lorraine Wong261356% games+6.2% vs expected
Ceyda Arslan + Kelly O'Donnell6158% games+3.8% vs expected
Debbie Skowron + Shannon Ebner11653% games+2.4% vs expected
Ceyda Arslan + Ginger Riessen8266% games+1.8% vs expected
Christi Cashman + Kelly O'Donnell6652% games+1.3% vs expected
Katerina Hickey + Shannon Ebner3350% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Shannon Ebner
84W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Julie Boruff
123W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Alexis Hiller
26W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cathy Evangelist
108W–96L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Katerina Hickey
87W–101L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Debbie Skowron
64W–54L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Christi Cashman
71W–71L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Denise Huth
87W–48L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Marla Gerard
38W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Lorraine Wong
83W–41L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Ozlen Er
43W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Ceyda Arslan
64W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Janelle Goins
36W–39L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
ELIZABETH JONES
19W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kara Levin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly O'Donnell
71W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzi Winters
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.