Teams

TOC.Ramaswamy

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-15vs TOC.GriswoldWon 10
W#1 SinglesAJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU vs Vaibhav Parmar6-1, 6-0
2024-11-24vs TOC.SchneiderWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Tejas Kharva6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU vs Daniel Moore6-1, 6-0
2024-11-12vs TOC.TaoLost 01
L#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs David Shelton4-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs TOC.ZhuWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Luo Xiao6-1, 6-1
2024-10-28vs MCP.MizeWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs David Hofberg3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs David Mize6-0, 6-1
2024-10-27vs TOC.ByrneWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Elton Hsiung4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnjaneya Tiwari vs Anthony Rizzuto6-4, 6-4
2024-10-08vs TOC.DesaiWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnjaneya Tiwari vs Steven Cataldo6-3, 6-0
2024-09-23vs TING.ChandraprakashWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnjaneya Tiwari vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Abhimanyu Joshi
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.96
Anjaneya Tiwari
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.39
Amit Sachan
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Srihari Murthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiran Ramaswamy + Abhimanyu Joshi6262% games+8.1% vs expected
Abhimanyu Joshi + Anjaneya Tiwari121053% games+1.2% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Kiran Ramaswamy15953% games−1.7% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Abhimanyu Joshi134 matchesnot enough data
Amit Sachan + Anjaneya Tiwari213 matchesnot enough data
Kiran Ramaswamy + Anjaneya Tiwari123 matchesnot enough data
Abhimanyu Joshi + AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abhimanyu Joshi
124W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.01
4
Anjaneya Tiwari
96W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU
80W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Amit Sachan
256W–241L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Srihari Murthy
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.