Teams

TING.Chandraprakash

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-11vs TOC.GriswoldWon 30
W#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Vaibhav Parmar6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Ravi Karanam6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Brandon Griffeth6-1, 6-1
2024-11-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Daniel Moore6-3, 6-3
2024-10-28vs TOC.ZhuWon 10
W#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Luo Xiao6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-24vs MCP.MizeWon 30
W#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Madhaveswer Gentela6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs David Mize6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Kaushik Vemulapalli6-1, 6-1
2024-10-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Rui Li7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-30vs TOC.DesaiSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Steven Cataldo3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Srivatsan Ramesh6-0, 7-5
2024-09-23vs TOC.RamaswamySplit 11
L#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Anjaneya Tiwari0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRavi Verma vs Mohammed Khan6-4, 6-3
2024-09-16vs TOC.ByrneLost 02
L#1 SinglesParikshith Chada vs Anthony Rizzuto7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRavi Verma vs Thomas Newton3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Vivek Singh
published
3.35
Ravi Verma
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Parikshith Chada
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashok Babu Raparla
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Niranjan Kalle
published
Sri Ram
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajshekar Chandraprakash + Ashok Babu Raparla161055% games+0.8% vs expected
Ravi Verma + Parikshith Chada224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
77W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
Vivek Singh
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ravi Verma
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Parikshith Chada
37W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ashok Babu Raparla
37W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Niranjan Kalle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sri Ram
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.