Teams

CSRC RYALS

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-09-05vs LTFCS ANEWALTLost 01
L#1 DoublesNate Hopkins / Mike Guinn vs Andrew Michaelson / Hamid Mortazavi3-6, 6-7
2023-08-29vs LTFCS CLIPSHAMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Greg Haynie / Vincent Lopez3-6, 2-6
2023-08-29vs GOG COLVARDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Campbell / Craig Gaydos vs Matthew Chang / Philip Erickson6-3, 7-6
2023-08-22vs MEMPK TOMPKINSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Johnson / Nate Hopkins vs Todd Goldstein / Mark Dale6-3, 6-4
2023-08-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Matt Campbell vs David Evans / William Stone1-6, 3-6
2023-08-15vs CCW MCCLELLANDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Tom Jackson / Lance McClelland6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-15vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Gaydos / John Swenson vs Taylor Lierheimer / James Gaston7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-01vs LTFCS ANEWALTLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenneth Ryals / Nate Hopkins vs Steven Anewalt / Andrew Michaelson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-01vs MEMPK ABELLOWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Anthony Park vs Kevin Wells / William Stone7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Jeff Carpenter vs Trent Glaser / Frederick Thurman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Mike Guinn
published 4
3.58
Richard Boyle
published
3.44
Nate Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Charlie Cuthill
published 3.5
3.21
Craig Gaydos
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.83
Leonard Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Hopkins + Mike Guinn15364% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mike Guinn
84W–51L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Richard Boyle
23W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Nate Hopkins
66W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Charlie Cuthill
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Craig Gaydos
95W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Leonard Green
33W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.