Teams

LTFCS ANEWALT

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs CSRC RYALSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Michaelson / Hamid Mortazavi vs Nate Hopkins / Mike Guinn6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Anewalt vs Richard Boyle6-7
2023-09-01vs LTFCS CLIPSHAMWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Anewalt / Andrew Michaelson vs David Clipsham / Vincent Lopez6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHamid Mortazavi / Jason Garl vs Scott VanDeVeer / Greg Haynie6-4, 6-4
2023-08-15vs MEMPK TOMPKINSWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Anewalt / Andrew Michaelson vs Nick Butler / John Tompkins6-2, 6-3
2023-08-08vs CCW MCCLELLANDLost 01
L#1 DoublesHamid Mortazavi / Brett Matheson vs Nathan Pritchard / Troy Kittelson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-04vs MEMPK TOMPKINSWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Anewalt / Andrew Michaelson vs Todd Goldstein / Mark Dale6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Pape / Hamid Mortazavi vs Nick Butler / John Swarmer6-0, 6-1
2023-08-01vs CSRC RYALSWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Anewalt / Andrew Michaelson vs Kenneth Ryals / Nate Hopkins6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Hamid Mortazavi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Andrew Michaelson
published 3.5
3.40
Steven Anewalt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Randall Bourgeois
published
3.17
Brett Matheson
published 3.5
3.06
Jason Garl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Anewalt + Andrew Michaelson9170% games+16.3% vs expected
Steven Anewalt + Hamid Mortazavi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hamid Mortazavi
69W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Andrew Michaelson
29W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Steven Anewalt
89W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Randall Bourgeois
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brett Matheson
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Jason Garl
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.