Teams

MLF BLACK

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-27vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerry Fine / Tyler Hempstead vs Sean Fettrow / Charles Edmondson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Schlicting / Terry Fine vs Jim Kelly / Derrick van der Sluys7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicholas Diel / Tyler Hempstead vs Peter Corran / Jeff Thompson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-13vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Ashbee / David Trevino vs Cory Lynch / Dennis Flanigan5-7, 6-7
2024-08-06vs FCCC REDSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTyler Hempstead vs Gregory Gibbs0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Fine / Scott Daigle vs Josh Shelby / Charles Edmondson6-0, 6-3
2024-07-30vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTyler Hempstead / Eric Jones vs Jim Kelly / David van Thuyne7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicholas Diel / David Trevino vs Peter Corran / Michael Baker6-7, 5-7
2024-07-23vs LVTA NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesTyler Hempstead vs Jason Summers6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Fine / Scott Daigle vs Dennis Flanigan / Cory Lynch6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Terry Fine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
3.86
Wil Buchanan
published
3.83
Tyler Hempstead
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
David Trevino
published 4
3.82
Scott Daigle
published
3.54
Joe Ashbee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Nicholas Diel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Hempstead + Wil Buchanan7361% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terry Fine
38W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Benjamin Schlicting
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Wil Buchanan
32W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Tyler Hempstead
68W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
David Trevino
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Scott Daigle
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Joe Ashbee
80W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Nicholas Diel
73W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Joseph Sriprajittichai
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.