Teams

SFT:Double the Fun:McKeever/Molda

2024 EMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women Flt 1

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesCharlene Deroche / Elaine Faria vs Cheryl Hemley / Joan Regan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine McKenna / DENISE NEWELL vs Jacqueline Bolduc / Linda Walsh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / Corinne Hickey vs Deborah DonovanPerez / Nancy Greeley6-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLucia Krinsky / Charlene Deroche vs Linda Walsh / Joan Regan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / Chong Treitel vs Nancy Greeley / Deborah DonovanPerez1-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs WIL:Wonder Women:KoontzLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlene Deroche / Tina Endicott vs Diane Sollars / Pamela Vazquez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / Christine McKenna vs Elizabeth Koontz / Sharon Sell0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Masse / Jane Doe vs Marizela Klebe / Regina Carusi2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-09vs TRU:Doubles Diva:BojsenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlene Deroche / DENISE NEWELL vs Lora Bojsen / Kelly Horan1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / Jane Doe vs Candyce Plante / Yoko Sano1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCorinne Hickey / Lucia Krinsky vs Tanya Dawkins / Donna Tanner0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCharlene Deroche / Elaine Faria vs Cheryl Hemley / Joan Regan5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJane Doe / Karen Masse vs Linda Walsh / Jacqueline Bolduc1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChong Treitel / Maureen Ketchum vs Rhonda McKeever / Deborah DonovanPerez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-11vs WIL:Wonder Women:KoontzLost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Faria / Christine McKenna vs Melissa Stankus / Sonja Murphy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Masse / Jane Doe vs Elizabeth Koontz / Diane Sollars6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / Tina Endicott vs Pamela Vazquez / Dorian Brown5-7, 4-6
2024-06-04vs TRU:Doubles Diva:BojsenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlene Deroche / Lucia Krinsky vs Lora Bojsen / Kelly Horan5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDENISE NEWELL / Elaine Faria vs Tanya Dawkins / Valerie Spencer6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJane Doe / Corinne Hickey vs Cheryl Rousseau / Yoko Sano3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-28vs TRU:Doubles Diva:BojsenLost 12
W#1 DoublesElaine Faria / Charlene Deroche vs Candyce Plante / Eileen Brady1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Doe / DENISE NEWELL vs Lora Bojsen / Yoko Sano6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Endicott / Karen Masse vs Linda Feng / Marie-Alene Orival4-6, 2-6
2024-05-21vs WIL:Wonder Women:KoontzLost 12
W#1 DoublesElaine Faria / Charlene Deroche vs Brenda Rugg / Pamela Vazquez6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ketchum / DENISE NEWELL vs Marizela Klebe / Regina Carusi4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChong Treitel / Corinne Hickey vs Elizabeth Koontz / Melissa Stankus0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Women Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TRU:Doubles Diva:Bojsen0920720210
2WIL:Wonder Women:Koontz09151229253
3SFT:Doubles or Nothin':McKeever/Sideman09141330244
4SFT:Double the Fun:McKeever/Molda0942350311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Molda
published 4
2.89
Rhonda McKeever
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Elaine Faria
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.69
Charlene Deroche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
DENISE NEWELL
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.26
Chong Treitel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Corinne Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Masse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lucia Krinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maureen Ketchum
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Tina Endicott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlene Deroche + Elaine Faria9355% games+3.0% vs expected
Rhonda McKeever + Charlene Deroche3356% gamesnot enough data
DENISE NEWELL + Charlene Deroche134 matchesnot enough data
DENISE NEWELL + Elaine Faria134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Molda
29W–23L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda McKeever
59W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Elaine Faria
17W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Charlene Deroche
53W–36L career · 8 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
DENISE NEWELL
3W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.37
2.5
Chong Treitel
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Corinne Hickey
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Masse
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucia Krinsky
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Ketchum
2W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Endicott
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.