Teams

RCW - Super Spinners (Yeagley)

2024 USTA 55 & Over Mx Doubles League · 6.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-14vs West Shore - Huff / JacobsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Hoffmaster / Robert Pleis vs Lisa Huff / Kurt Krusen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrett Yeagley / Bunny Gantt vs Maureen Sheehe / Brad Shopp4-6, 5-7
2024-03-25vs RCW - Loose Strings (Helm)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrett Yeagley / Marcia Andrews vs Beth Alderman / Frank Steinruck2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Pleis / Jean Bednarski vs Tod Tompkins / Duffy Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMarcia Andrews / Brett Yeagley vs ANGELA SHEA / Donald Danser4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJean Bednarski / Robert Pleis vs Eileen McNulty / Frank Collins4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-15vs Hempfield - TomodachiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcia Andrews / Brett Yeagley vs Daniel Reese / Deborah Broskey1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Pleis / Jean Bednarski vs Kosta Kontanis / Linda Janiszewski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-10vs YACTA - SchrominatorsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Yeagley / Pam Hoffmaster vs Marty Jacobs / Susan Rebert5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRodney Stone / Jean Bednarski vs Larry Lohss / Kathryn Precopio6-2, 6-1
2024-03-02vs West Shore - Huff / JacobsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcia Andrews / Robert Pleis vs Kurt Krusen / Lisa Huff2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPam Hoffmaster / Brett Yeagley vs BOBBY CHEEKA / Maureen Sheehe4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMarcia Andrews / Brett Yeagley vs Linda Dolfi / Lacy Woodruff3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBunny Gantt / Robert Pleis vs Michael Spondello / Melody Brough6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDennie Stone / Rodney Stone vs Brad Gebhart / Sandra Holte2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJean Bednarski / Robert Pleis vs Richard Frye / Mary Ann Vespignani2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Yeagley / Bunny Gantt vs Sandra Crespo / Gilbert Brown1-6, 1-6
2024-01-26vs Hempfield - Baumer 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Bednarski / Brett Yeagley vs Miriam Witmer / Jay Rosenthal2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDennie Stone / Rodney Stone vs Kathy Nolt / Shaun Balani6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBunny Gantt / Robert Pleis vs Tina Fellenbaum / Brian Hauck0-6, 2-6
2024-01-20vs YACTA - SchrominatorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJean Bednarski / Brett Yeagley vs Dave Schrom / Muriel Crabbs0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDennie Stone / Rodney Stone vs Cindy Morela / Noel Conway3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 6.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hershey - Golden Guys and Dolls (Trapp)01025514158
2RCW - Loose Strings (Helm)01023718196
3Hempfield - Baumer 6.001021922219
4West Shore - Huff / Jacobs010181229231
5YACTA - Schrominators010131735257
6Hempfield - Tomodachi01092146292
7Hershey - Ready for Prime Time (Trapp)01062450318
8RCW - Super Spinners (Yeagley)01052551317

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Pam Hoffmaster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Marcia Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bunny Gantt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dennie Stone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Randolph Andrews
published 3
2.45
Brett Yeagley
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jean Bednarski
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Robert Pleis
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rodney Stone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randolph Andrews + Marcia Andrews82843% games−4.3% vs expected
Jean Bednarski + Robert Pleis134 matchesnot enough data
Bunny Gantt + Robert Pleis224 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Andrews + Brett Yeagley044 matchesnot enough data
Dennie Stone + Rodney Stone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Hoffmaster
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.85
Marcia Andrews
74W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Bunny Gantt
46W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dennie Stone
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Randolph Andrews
16W–79L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Brett Yeagley
14W–72L career · 10 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.45
Jean Bednarski
29W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Pleis
6W–30L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rodney Stone
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.