Teams

Broward/Wank/55&Over8.0W

2025 Broward Adult 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Sharon Runk
published 4.5
4.22
Kumiko Currie
published
4.05
Jill Rickey
published 4.5
3.79
Veronica Wank
published 4
3.77
Cristina Tomadin
published 4
3.74
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.71
Kim Brown
published
3.62
Lori Paglini
published 4
3.56
Sigal Sasson
published
3.47
Tammy Gibson
published
3.37
Ana Pastorino
published 3.5
3.07
Theresa Caruso
published
Ina Gluck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Runk + Veronica Wank7264% games+4.9% vs expected
Cristina Tomadin + Clarena Furtado6556% games+0.1% vs expected
Lori Paglini + Kim Brown101150% games−3.2% vs expected
Theresa Caruso + Ana Pastorino6846% games−4.7% vs expected
Cristina Tomadin + Veronica Wank4844% games−16.5% vs expected
Sharon Runk + Jill Rickey8559% gamesnot enough data
Ina Gluck + Veronica Wank8264% gamesnot enough data
Kumiko Currie + Jill Rickey4547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sharon Runk
136W–57L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.49
Kumiko Currie
111W–81L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Jill Rickey
109W–122L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Veronica Wank
148W–154L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cristina Tomadin
266W–200L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Brown
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Lori Paglini
56W–76L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Sigal Sasson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Tammy Gibson
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Ana Pastorino
288W–153L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Theresa Caruso
98W–182L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Ina Gluck
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.