Teams

RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/Liljedahl

2026 NCT Adult 18 & Over Day Women · 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Maulucci / Wendy Heller vs Kayleigh Conrad / Laura Hoffman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Zemel vs Sarah McLarney6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Brewer / Kelly Lynch vs Sarah Pfinsgraff / Maribel Fernandez2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLauren Brewer / Wendy Heller vs Laura Hoffman / Kayleigh Conrad4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Zemel vs Sarah McLarney4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Lynch / Kathleen Lesser-Trask vs Sarah Pfinsgraff / Sarah Schmidt6-4, 6-2
2026-01-22vs FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/BarkleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Maulucci / Lauren Brewer vs Noreen Pfadenhauer / Pauline Karmelowicz1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Zemel vs Kimberly Nguyen7-6, 4-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Lynch / Anne Pidano vs Guelly Mendez / Kaitlin Boland6-2, 6-2
2025-12-11vs FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/BarkleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Heller / Kathleen Lesser-Trask vs Noreen Pfadenhauer / Merissa Dandeneau3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Zemel vs Kimberly Nguyen6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRona Gollob / Carolyn Lech vs Suzanna Hocevar / Maria Cotteleer0-6, 4-6
2025-12-04vs FV:Court Crushers:Reardon/KinsellaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeri Lee Tyler / Linnea Liljedahl vs Melodi Kinsella / Cara Koster5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Dyal vs Tanya Kempf1-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Pidano / Wendy Heller vs Anita Levitz / Jessica Olivieri1-6, 2-6
2025-10-30vs FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/BarkleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Maulucci / Lauren Brewer vs Kimberly Nguyen / Suzanna Hocevar3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMeri Lee Tyler vs Katie Fuller6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRona Gollob / Kelly Lynch vs Noreen Pfadenhauer / Heather Barkley4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Knapp Thomas / Kathleen Lesser-Trask vs Melodi Kinsella / Laura Hoffman2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAmy Zemel vs Sarah McLarney6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Pidano / Kelly Lynch vs Kayleigh Conrad / Julia Olsen7-5, 6-2
2025-09-18vs FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/BarkleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeri Lee Tyler / Julie Puzzo vs Kimberly Nguyen / Katherine Walters6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Dyal vs Katie Fuller6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Brewer / Susan Knapp Thomas vs Noreen Pfadenhauer / Maria Cotteleer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/Liljedahl0814923214
2FV:Court Crushers:Reardon/Kinsella08101328216
3FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/Barkley08111329213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Meri Lee Tyler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.53
Amy Zemel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.51
Amanda Dyal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Linnea Liljedahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Julie Puzzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Kathleen Lesser-Trask
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Lech
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Anne Pidano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Jacqueline Maulucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Lauren Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
1.94
Rona Gollob
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Noelle Crawford
published
Susan Knapp Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Heller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meri Lee Tyler + Linnea Liljedahl3356% games−1.6% vs expected
Meri Lee Tyler + Susan Knapp Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Meri Lee Tyler + Kathleen Lesser-Trask123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Knapp Thomas + Kathleen Lesser-Trask123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meri Lee Tyler
39W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Amy Zemel
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Amanda Dyal
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Linnea Liljedahl
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Julie Puzzo
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Kathleen Lesser-Trask
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Carolyn Lech
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anne Pidano
46W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Jacqueline Maulucci
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Lauren Brewer
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Rona Gollob
9W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Noelle Crawford
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Knapp Thomas
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Heller
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.