Teams

FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/Barkley

2026 NCT Adult 18 & Over Day Women · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesSuzanna Hocevar / Pauline Karmelowicz vs Anita Levitz / Kayleigh Conrad7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHeather Barkley vs Jessica Olivieri6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCeleste Kohlhoff / Katherine Walters vs Sarah Schmidt / Jayme Bianconi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-22vs RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/LiljedahlLost 12
W#1 DoublesNoreen Pfadenhauer / Pauline Karmelowicz vs Jacqueline Maulucci / Lauren Brewer6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Nguyen vs Amy Zemel6-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesGuelly Mendez / Kaitlin Boland vs Kelly Lynch / Anne Pidano2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesHeather Barkley / Pauline Karmelowicz vs Kayleigh Conrad / Jessie Fulton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuzanna Hocevar vs Molly Rutledge3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCeleste Kohlhoff / Maria Cotteleer vs Maribel Fernandez / Jayme Bianconi7-5, 6-1
2025-12-11vs RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/LiljedahlWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoreen Pfadenhauer / Merissa Dandeneau vs Wendy Heller / Kathleen Lesser-Trask6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Nguyen vs Amy Zemel1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanna Hocevar / Maria Cotteleer vs Rona Gollob / Carolyn Lech6-0, 6-4
2025-11-13vs FV:Court Crushers:Reardon/KinsellaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nguyen / Merissa Dandeneau vs Kayleigh Conrad / Tanya Kempf1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Barkley vs Sarah McLarney6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Boland / Guelly Mendez vs Julia Olsen / Jessie Fulton2-6, 2-6
2025-10-30vs RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/LiljedahlWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Nguyen / Suzanna Hocevar vs Jacqueline Maulucci / Lauren Brewer6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Fuller vs Meri Lee Tyler0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNoreen Pfadenhauer / Heather Barkley vs Rona Gollob / Kelly Lynch6-4, 6-3
2025-10-09vs FV:Court Crushers:Reardon/KinsellaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMerissa Dandeneau / Katherine Walters vs Kayleigh Conrad / Melodi Kinsella3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Barkley vs Jessica Olivieri6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Boland / Guelly Mendez vs Molly Rutledge / Sarah Schmidt1-6, 3-6
2025-09-18vs RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/LiljedahlLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nguyen / Katherine Walters vs Meri Lee Tyler / Julie Puzzo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Fuller vs Amanda Dyal4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNoreen Pfadenhauer / Maria Cotteleer vs Lauren Brewer / Susan Knapp Thomas3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFL:Kiss My Ace:Tyler/Liljedahl0814923214
2FV:Court Crushers:Reardon/Kinsella08101328216
3FV:Triple B’s:Hocevar/Barkley08111329213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Kimberly Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.39
Heather Barkley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.35
Suzanna Hocevar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Merissa Dandeneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Katherine Walters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Pauline Karmelowicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Celeste Kohlhoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Katie Fuller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.23
Noreen Pfadenhauer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.08
Maria Cotteleer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Guelly Mendez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Kaitlin Boland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Nguyen + Suzanna Hocevar224 matchesnot enough data
Guelly Mendez + Kaitlin Boland033 matchesnot enough data
Heather Barkley + Kaitlin Boland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Nguyen
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Heather Barkley
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Suzanna Hocevar
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Merissa Dandeneau
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Katherine Walters
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Pauline Karmelowicz
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Celeste Kohlhoff
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Fuller
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Noreen Pfadenhauer
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Maria Cotteleer
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Guelly Mendez
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Kaitlin Boland
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.