Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-20vs CSRC BARKERLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoel Beck / David Evans vs Travis Anderson / Mike Guinn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoah Muayad vs Marcos Velasco6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesArthur Bachet / Changseok Lee vs Zach Barker / Jeff Vest6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Stone vs Ryan Hill6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Schochet / Gregory Smith vs Nick Butler / Charles Autry6-7, 5-7
2025-05-13vs GOG COLVARDWon 50
W#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Joel Beck vs Craig Engelage / Timothy Stacey6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDan Campos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHugo Fontalvo / Phil Abello vs Patrick Sheehy / Chris Couch7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesWilliam Stone vs Charles Ripp6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Schochet / Gregory Smith vs Doug Colvard / Nikhil Dhuna7-6, 6-4
2025-05-06vs LTFCS DARKWon 32
W#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Joel Beck vs Brett Matheson / Troy Ockerman6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesArthur Bachet vs Raj Menon2-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesDan Campos / Ronald Graham vs Trent Glaser / Taylor Lierheimer3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNoah Muayad vs John Purcell4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Schochet / Gregory Smith vs Cederick Dark / James Gaston7-6, 6-3
2025-04-29vs CSRC BARKERLost 23
L#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Joel Beck vs Travis Anderson / Jeff Vest2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesArthur Bachet vs Kenneth Thornton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWilliam Stone / Changseok Lee vs Mike Guinn / Nate Hopkins3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNoah Muayad vs Marcos Velasco6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGreg Schochet / Gregory Smith vs Nick Butler / Charles Autry6-4, 6-2
2025-04-22vs GOG COLVARDWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoel Beck / David Evans vs Jason Carter / Chris Couch6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesArthur Bachet vs Timothy Stacey6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHugo Fontalvo / Greg Schochet vs Patrick Sheehy / Nikhil Dhuna3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesNoah Muayad vs Mark McDowell6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / Ronald Graham vs Craig Engelage / Doug Colvard6-4, 7-6
2025-04-15vs LTFCS DARKWon 41
W#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Greg Schochet vs Taylor Lierheimer / Trent Glaser6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesArthur Bachet vs Raj Menon6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChangseok Lee / Hugo Fontalvo vs Brett Matheson / James Gaston5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesWilliam Stone vs Joel Collins6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNoah Muayad / Ronald Graham vs Neal Siegel / Regan Arntzen6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Arthur Bachet
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.52
William Stone
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Gregory Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Noah Muayad
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Changseok Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Dan Campos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Joel Beck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hugo Fontalvo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Ronald Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Greg Schochet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Phil Abello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Greg Schochet5356% games+1.6% vs expected
William Stone + Phil Abello3345% games−5.5% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
William Stone + Changseok Lee224 matchesnot enough data
William Stone + Arthur Bachet404 matchesnot enough data
Joel Beck + Arthur Bachet314 matchesnot enough data
William Stone + Gregory Smith213 matchesnot enough data
William Stone + Greg Schochet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arthur Bachet
44W–23L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
William Stone
53W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Gregory Smith
80W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Noah Muayad
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Changseok Lee
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Dan Campos
106W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Joel Beck
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Hugo Fontalvo
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Graham
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Greg Schochet
20W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.