Teams

LTFCS DARK

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-20vs GOG COLVARDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTroy Ockerman / Brett Matheson vs Craig Engelage / Mark McDowell7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Gaston / Taylor Lierheimer vs Patrick Sheehy / Nikhil Dhuna4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Purcell vs Timothy Stacey5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRegan Arntzen / Joel Collins vs Doug Colvard / Matthew Chang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-13vs CSRC BARKERLost 13
L#1 DoublesTrent Glaser / Taylor Lierheimer vs Travis Anderson / Ryan Hill1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrett Matheson vs Kenneth Thornton3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Siegel / Joel Collins vs Nate Hopkins / Jeff Vest2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCederick Dark / James Gaston vs Nick Butler / Zach Barker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-06vs MEMPK ABELLOLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrett Matheson / Troy Ockerman vs David Evans / Joel Beck1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRaj Menon vs Arthur Bachet6-2, 3-0
W#2 DoublesTrent Glaser / Taylor Lierheimer vs Dan Campos / Ronald Graham6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJohn Purcell vs Noah Muayad6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCederick Dark / James Gaston vs Greg Schochet / Gregory Smith6-7, 3-6
2025-04-29vs GOG COLVARDWon 30
W#1 DoublesTroy Ockerman / Brett Matheson vs Nikhil Dhuna / Craig Engelage7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTaylor Lierheimer / Trent Glaser vs Joe Saliba / Charles Ripp6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNeal Siegel / John Purcell vs Doug Colvard / Matthew Chang7-5, 6-4
2025-04-22vs CSRC BARKERLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrett Matheson / James Gaston vs Nate Hopkins / Mike Guinn1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRaj Menon vs Ryan Hill6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTrent Glaser / Cederick Dark vs Zach Barker / Jeff Vest3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoel Collins vs Travis Anderson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNeal Siegel / Regan Arntzen vs Charles Autry / Sam Wassink2-6, 1-6
2025-04-15vs MEMPK ABELLOLost 14
L#1 DoublesTaylor Lierheimer / Trent Glaser vs David Evans / Greg Schochet2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRaj Menon vs Arthur Bachet3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Matheson / James Gaston vs Changseok Lee / Hugo Fontalvo7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJoel Collins vs William Stone4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNeal Siegel / Regan Arntzen vs Noah Muayad / Ronald Graham2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Trent Glaser
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Taylor Lierheimer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
John Purcell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Randall Bourgeois
published
3.20
Cederick Dark
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Brett Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
James Gaston
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Regan Arntzen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Neal Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joel Collins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Raj Menon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Troy Ockerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cederick Dark + Taylor Lierheimer4251% games+4.6% vs expected
Brett Matheson + James Gaston4250% games−0.8% vs expected
Brett Matheson + Troy Ockerman2444% games−3.2% vs expected
James Gaston + Neal Siegel1640% games−6.8% vs expected
Trent Glaser + Cederick Dark2350% gamesnot enough data
Trent Glaser + Taylor Lierheimer224 matchesnot enough data
Neal Siegel + Joel Collins213 matchesnot enough data
John Purcell + Randall Bourgeois213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trent Glaser
24W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Taylor Lierheimer
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
John Purcell
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Randall Bourgeois
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cederick Dark
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Brett Matheson
6W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
James Gaston
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Regan Arntzen
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Neal Siegel
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
Joel Collins
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raj Menon
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Troy Ockerman
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.