Teams

UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Men - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-13vs UPTA18C/Meredith/ACACLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephen Brown / Colin Gallagher vs Ryan Polk / Michael Sherman3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBoyce Markham / Ben Wiles vs Brad Meredith / Jerome Lawson II2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Hommes / Matthew Fox vs Frank Powell / Hugo Juarez7-5, 6-3
2025-08-16vs UPTA18C/Heyde/Neely FarmWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Brown / Troy Botts vs Brad Heyde / Jeff Greenstreet6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Fox / Patrick Rosopa vs Csaba Kiss / Jeff Warren3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Hommes / RAJ DAVE vs Henry Oleary / Justin Glinisty2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Combo Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
David Hommes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Matthew Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Boyce Markham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Troy Botts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Andrew Pettus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Johnny Pack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Daniel Dukes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Patrick Rosopa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
RAJ DAVE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Ben Wiles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.03
Colin Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Richard Penland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Troy Botts + Johnny Pack6265% games+23.3% vs expected
Matthew Fox + Johnny Pack7263% games+15.4% vs expected
Matthew Fox + RAJ DAVE5255% games+5.7% vs expected
Richard Penland + Colin Gallagher2443% games−1.8% vs expected
Matthew Fox + Troy Botts2347% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Fox + Daniel Dukes314 matchesnot enough data
Troy Botts + Ben Wiles404 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Fox + Andrew Pettus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Hommes
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Matthew Fox
66W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
4
Boyce Markham
5W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Troy Botts
67W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
4
Andrew Pettus
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Johnny Pack
40W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Dukes
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Patrick Rosopa
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
RAJ DAVE
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Ben Wiles
27W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Colin Gallagher
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Richard Penland
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.