Teams

FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40AM4.0D

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#3 DoublesJonathan Tsang / Erik Lee vs Dylan Ragozin / Adam Bloom5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-02-22vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Tsang / Kurt Kwok vs Donald Kung / Nicholas Zeitlin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCasey Swan / Shuntaro Takeuchi vs SUNGHO KIM / Clark Ko1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTodd Lewis vs Hyoungin Kwon6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandeep Bangera / Jonathan Nazareno vs Young Min Kim / TAEJEONG UHM3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTroy Collard / Keiichiro Yumiba vs Robert Chien / Jahyong Kuh3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Abhishek Nishis
published 4.5
4.15
Erik Lee
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.90
Christian John
published 4
3.88
Jonathan Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Alan Blank
published 4
3.88
Sandeep Bangera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Jonathan Felder
published
3.86
Dean Wong
published 4
3.83
Shuntaro Takeuchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Todd Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Seth Hazen
published
3.78
Keiichiro Yumiba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Casey Swan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Jonathan Nazareno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kurt Kwok
published
3.38
Andy Ting
published 4
3.29
Troy Collard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shuntaro Takeuchi + Christian John213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abhishek Nishis
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Erik Lee
25W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
4.15
4
Christian John
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jonathan Tsang
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Alan Blank
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Sandeep Bangera
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Jonathan Felder
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Dean Wong
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
Shuntaro Takeuchi
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Todd Lewis
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Seth Hazen
24W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Keiichiro Yumiba
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Casey Swan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Nazareno
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Kurt Kwok
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
4
Andy Ting
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Troy Collard
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.