Teams

WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesSUNGHO KIM / Clark Ko vs Casey Swan / Shuntaro Takeuchi6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHyoungin Kwon vs Todd Lewis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYoung Min Kim / TAEJEONG UHM vs Sandeep Bangera / Jonathan Nazareno6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Chien / Jahyong Kuh vs Troy Collard / Keiichiro Yumiba6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Clark Ko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Young Min Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
SUNGHO KIM
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
TAEIL UM
published
3.61
Jahyong Kuh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Robert Chien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Hyondeuk Kim
published
3.49
Hyoungin Kwon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Eunsoo Lee
published
2.98
Sherman Lee
published
Junghwan Lee
published
TAEJEONG UHM
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wonjae Lee
published
Yong Suk Kwon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clark Ko + TAEIL UM4162% games+5.1% vs expected
SUNGHO KIM + Young Min Kim4255% games−4.3% vs expected
Clark Ko + SUNGHO KIM303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clark Ko
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Young Min Kim
47W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
SUNGHO KIM
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
TAEIL UM
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jahyong Kuh
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Robert Chien
33W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Hyondeuk Kim
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Hyoungin Kwon
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Eunsoo Lee
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Sherman Lee
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Junghwan Lee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
TAEJEONG UHM
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wonjae Lee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yong Suk Kwon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.