Teams

Marco YMCA - Correa

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-02vs Longshore Lake - PallerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Lisa Chappell / Marilyn Galbraith6-3, 6-2
2024-11-25vs Collier/Howard/65&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Patricia Clayman / Patricia Miles6-7, 2-6
2024-11-18vs Cambier - SouthallWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Tillie Ann Lapierre / Toni Trombley6-4, 6-1
2024-11-17vs Pelican Marsh/BettyBoops - KobelWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Nancy Spiwak / Cindy Leiding6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean Martin / Kristine Bergenheim vs Helen Sharp / Stephanie Eldredge6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Elisabeth Teller / Lynn Lauck7-5, 6-4
2024-11-04vs Valencia Bonita - ProchiloSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Patricia Doran / Maria Prochilo6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Deb Dorsey vs Bobbi Burnett / Lorraine Steuerer6-7, 2-6
2024-10-27vs Sterling Oaks - WheelerLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Chandler / Pattie Yergler vs Deborah Norton / Lani Wheeler6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Karen Correa
published
3.33
Janet Reichhard
published
3.29
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Sally Mattke
published
3.11
Peggy Chandler
published
3.10
Jodi Schaufus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattie Yergler + Karen Correa7749% games+2.0% vs expected
Jodi Schaufus + Peggy Chandler3548% gamesnot enough data
Karen Correa + Deb Dorsey134 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Schaufus + Deb Dorsey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Janet Reichhard
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Peggy Chandler
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Jodi Schaufus
23W–19L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.