Teams

Longshore Lake - Paller

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-02vs Marco YMCA - CorreaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Chappell / Marilyn Galbraith vs Karen Correa / Pattie Yergler3-6, 2-6
2024-11-25vs Pelican Marsh/BettyBoops - KobelWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine MacWilliams / Lisa Chappell vs Linda Boyd / Nancy Spiwak6-3, 6-2
2024-11-18vs Sterling Oaks - WheelerLost 01
L#2 DoublesElsie Jerozal / Joyce Perry vs Lani Wheeler / Elisabeth Beck2-6, 4-6
2024-11-13vs Cambier - SouthallLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoyce Perry / Ruth Spanos vs Elise McHugh-Joyce / Virginia Southall6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-11vs Naples YMCA - MagnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaurie Black / Lisa Chappell vs Nancy Hansen / Carola Heinrich6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElsie Jerozal / Joyce Perry vs Barbara Frank / Brenda Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-28vs Collier/Howard/65&Over7.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesDarlene Carpenter / Joyce Perry vs Judy Howell / Tara Porte2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesKatherine MacWilliams / Lisa Chappell vs Betty Sayad / Valerie Barrett2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElsie Jerozal / Joyce Perry vs Rebecca Meath / Marion Malone6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
3.29
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.26
Debra Fischer
published 3.5
3.10
Darlene Carpenter
published 3.5
Elsie Jerozal
published
Joyce Perry
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Laurie Black
published
Lisa Chappell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ruth Spanos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsie Jerozal + Debra Fischer3646% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Chappell + Katherine MacWilliams4259% gamesnot enough data
Elsie Jerozal + Deborah Paller2346% gamesnot enough data
Katherine MacWilliams + Deborah Paller4165% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Black + Darlene Carpenter2346% gamesnot enough data
Elsie Jerozal + Katherine MacWilliams303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Chappell + Laurie Black213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Debra Fischer
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Darlene Carpenter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Elsie Jerozal
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Perry
40W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Black
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Chappell
70W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Spanos
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.