Teams

KY/LEX/Johnson/Coy

2022 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Leslie Stone
published
3.68
Erin Azbell
published 4
3.64
Lana Stephens
published
3.62
3.41
Janine Coy
published
3.39
Emily Diehl
published 3.5
3.29
Allyssa Kilanowski
published 3.5
3.24
3.23
Mily Ralsten
published
3.12
Amy Bain
published 3.5
3.09
Tanya Johnson
published
2.86
Leigh Shapiro
published
2.67
Charing Kelsey
published 3
Laura Kirkley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Diehl + Janine Coy5263% games+9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Stone
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Erin Azbell
39W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Lana Stephens
18W–20L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michelle Abou-Jaoude
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Janine Coy
102W–61L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Emily Diehl
99W–69L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Allyssa Kilanowski
26W–52L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
45W–53L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Mily Ralsten
25W–30L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Bain
22W–26L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Tanya Johnson
13W–53L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Leigh Shapiro
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Charing Kelsey
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Laura Kirkley
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.