Teams

Red Ledges-Overton/Wood

2022 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-19Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Jen Dagley vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Emily Hales4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Overton / Melody Young vs Jessica Whittaker / Sherrie Hatch3-6, 3-6
2022-10-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Jen Dagley vs Lisa Beames / Kat Fuller2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGiuliana Willis vs Amber Thompson0-6, 3-6
2022-10-05vs Sports Mall-Lyon/GeorgeWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Carly Johnston vs Erin Bradley / Kristen Bradley6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShana Wood / Megan Overton vs Emily Peterson / Heather George6-3, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMelissa Smith / Giuliana Willis vs Sarah Gardner / Hallie Russell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-28vs Wasatch Rec Center-Davis/McBrideSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Jen Dagley vs Jennifer Davies / Wendy Heywood6-3, 6-1
L#4 DoublesGiuliana Willis / Suzette Cannon vs Alyse Luster / Dawn Seare7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-21vs Ivory Ridge-McCord/WilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Jen Dagley vs Penny McCord / Jennifer Wily5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShana Wood / Suzette Cannon vs Gaylynn Gale / Camille Ross7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesMelody Young / Giuliana Willis vs Valine Vikari / Shauna Peterson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-14vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stone / Jen Dagley vs Cyndi Madsen / Robyn Cardon6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Jones / Clarissa McLeod vs Raquel Moss / LaRicia Belliston6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#4 DoublesMegan Overton / Suzette Cannon vs Jill Marsh / Beatriz Velazquez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-31Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarly Johnston / Elisabeth Jones vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Emily Hales1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGiuliana Willis vs Jaime Vance0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShana Wood / Colleen Boland vs Jessica Whittaker / Rebecca Harman1-6, 5-7
2022-08-24vs Sports Mall-Majors/JensenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarly Johnston / Jennifer Stone vs Trisha Cutrer / Martha Brown3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Overton / Shana Wood vs Camille Weaver / Amber Thompson2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesColleen Boland / Giuliana Willis vs Brenda Green / Kari Majors5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Cheryl A McCullough
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.14
Jen Dagley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Jennifer Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Megan Overton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Carly Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.81
Clarissa McLeod
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Elisabeth Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Giuliana Willis
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Shana Wood
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.55
Stefanie Maddox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Colleen Boland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Melissa Smith
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published
Suzette Cannon
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Jones + Clarissa McLeod11953% games+11.1% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Elisabeth Jones4845% games+7.9% vs expected
Giuliana Willis + Carly Johnston5358% games+7.9% vs expected
Stefanie Maddox + Clarissa McLeod6550% games+7.6% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Shana Wood132050% games+6.3% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Stefanie Maddox7552% games+6.1% vs expected
Giuliana Willis + Elisabeth Jones3251% games+5.3% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Jennifer Stone3744% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl A McCullough
87W–59L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Jen Dagley
79W–114L career · 10 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Stone
91W–103L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Megan Overton
89W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carly Johnston
109W–121L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Clarissa McLeod
75W–72L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elisabeth Jones
64W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Giuliana Willis
39W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Shana Wood
85W–130L career · 8 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Stefanie Maddox
69W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Colleen Boland
20W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Smith
18W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzette Cannon
63W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.