Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Natalie Wong vs Catherine Hudson / Nina Kim6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Nilgun Reed vs Martha Ehrenfeld / Mary Anne Ruyle6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLorie Lambert / Tiffany Truong vs Catherine Hudson / Vicky Perez4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShan Lu / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Jacinta Mccann / Susan Vollmer1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Linda Geballe / Mary Anne Ruyle6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRia Mendoza / Theresia Treadway vs Linda Geballe / Lois Anne Indorf5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesShan Lu / Natalie Wong vs Sally Brien / Daphne Zenk7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresia Treadway / Nilgun Reed vs Janis Porto / Lois Anne Indorf6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Packard / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Martha Ehrenfeld / Karen Forsthoff4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSu-Mien Chong / Hannah Kim vs Martha Ehrenfeld / Lesley Martin1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLorie Lambert / Natalie Wong vs Susan Vollmer / Jacinta Mccann2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Nilgun Reed vs Lois Anne Indorf / Mary Anne Ruyle6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Natalie Batlin / Karen Forsthoff6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKaterina Novitskaya / Kathy Fan vs Linda Geballe / Lesley Martin6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSu-Mien Chong / Shan Lu vs Martha Ehrenfeld / Vicky Perez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTiffany Truong / Maria Isabella Canlas vs Paula Mangin / Daphne Zenk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRia Mendoza / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Natalie Batlin / Lesley Martin4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRia Mendoza / Hannah Kim vs Vicky Perez / Adrienne Ladd3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Maria Isabella Canlas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Kathy Fan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Ria Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Karen Toledo
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.46
Angela Lam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Lorie Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Shan Lu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Nilgun Reed
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Natalie Wong
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Theresia Treadway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Su-Mien Chong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Tiffany Truong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Becky Packard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katerina Novitskaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Truong + Su-Mien Chong2348% gamesnot enough data
Shan Lu + Natalie Wong224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Fan + Lorie Lambert134 matchesnot enough data
Angela Lam + Kathy Fan213 matchesnot enough data
Becky Packard + Lorie Lambert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Isabella Canlas
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kathy Fan
34W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Karen Toledo
31W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Angela Lam
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.46
Lorie Lambert
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Shan Lu
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
Nilgun Reed
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Natalie Wong
19W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Theresia Treadway
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.28
Su-Mien Chong
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Tiffany Truong
5W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Becky Packard
8W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Katerina Novitskaya
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.