Teams

TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-23vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Ehrenfeld / Mary Anne Ruyle vs Maria Isabella Canlas / Nilgun Reed3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hudson / Vicky Perez vs Lorie Lambert / Tiffany Truong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacinta Mccann / Susan Vollmer vs Shan Lu / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke6-1, 7-5
2025-10-10vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesSally Brien / Daphne Zenk vs Shan Lu / Natalie Wong7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanis Porto / Lois Anne Indorf vs Theresia Treadway / Nilgun Reed7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMartha Ehrenfeld / Karen Forsthoff vs Becky Packard / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke6-4, 6-3
2025-10-03vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatalie Batlin / Nina Kim vs Joanna Brook / Elizabeth Anderson6-1, 6-3
2025-09-26vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Ehrenfeld / Lesley Martin vs Su-Mien Chong / Hannah Kim6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Vollmer / Jacinta Mccann vs Lorie Lambert / Natalie Wong6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLois Anne Indorf / Mary Anne Ruyle vs Maria Isabella Canlas / Nilgun Reed2-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Geballe / Lesley Martin vs Katerina Novitskaya / Kathy Fan7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Ehrenfeld / Vicky Perez vs Su-Mien Chong / Shan Lu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Mangin / Daphne Zenk vs Tiffany Truong / Maria Isabella Canlas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Linda Geballe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Adrienne Ladd
published 4
3.72
Natalie Batlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Sally Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lesley Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Martha Ehrenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Daphne Zenk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Paula Mangin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacinta Mccann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Nina Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Mary Anne Ruyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Joanne Poile
published
Janis Porto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Forsthoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Emery
published
Lois Anne Indorf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maimi Hom
published
Pearl Villena
published
Susan Vollmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Vicky Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Batlin + Linda Geballe6256% games+2.9% vs expected
Daphne Zenk + Paula Mangin314 matchesnot enough data
Lois Anne Indorf + Karen Forsthoff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Geballe
50W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Adrienne Ladd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Sally Brien
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lesley Martin
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Martha Ehrenfeld
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Daphne Zenk
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Paula Mangin
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jacinta Mccann
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Kim
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Mary Anne Ruyle
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Joanne Poile
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Janis Porto
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Forsthoff
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Emery
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lois Anne Indorf
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maimi Hom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pearl Villena
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Vollmer
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicky Perez
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.