Teams

HANSEN 40 and FAB 4.5

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs Northern/McDonald/40&Over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesCathy Paper / Alison Khan vs Anna Lyon / Kaelie Breiter1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Bowles vs Rachel LaTour3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson vs Danielle Niska / Christie Williams1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Boado / Ann Cadwallader vs Elisabeth Walker / Rhonda Greene2-6, 4-6
2025-07-07vs Northern/McDonald/40&Over4.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesChristine Conner / Amy Lamparske vs Amy Mitchell / Suzie Heideman2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAlison Khan vs Kaelie Breiter0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Hansen / Noelle Dougan vs Anna Lyon / Danielle Niska2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Bowles / Sara Ormseth vs Patricia Goodrich / Rhonda Greene0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesStacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson vs Linnea Benson / Maggie Niska2-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs Northern/McDonald/40&Over4.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmy Lamparske / Alison Khan vs Anna Lyon / Danielle Niska2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Bowles vs Kaelie Breiter4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Conner / Dana Hansen vs Amy Mitchell / Jill Johnson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Cadwallader / Andrea Boado vs Sara Humann / Amy Jamieson2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesSara Ormseth / Patricia White vs Suzie Heideman / Jacqueline Dutot0-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs Northern/McDonald/40&Over4.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesJean Noack / Noelle Dougan vs Anna Lyon / Kaelie Breiter4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAlison Khan vs Danielle Niska1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Bowles / Sara Ormseth vs Amy Mitchell / Maggie Niska1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Cadwallader / Patricia White vs Rhonda Greene / Jill Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesStacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson vs Jennifer Miller / Sara Humann5-7, 2-6
2025-05-12vs Smiley/Favor '25 (40+)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Paper / Amy Lamparske vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Theresa Harich5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Bowles / Brenda Martinson vs Lynda Stout / Kristin Heywood6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Ormseth / Andrea Boado vs Laura Nielsen / Renae Goter1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Lamparske
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Dana Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Alison Khan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Stacy Katsiyiannis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
4.00
Christine Conner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Noelle Dougan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Brenda Martinson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
Jean Noack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Ann Cadwallader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Julie Bowles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.83
Cathy Paper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Sara Ormseth
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.73
Andrea Boado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Victoria Krauss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Patricia White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Katsiyiannis + Sara Ormseth5450% games+7.8% vs expected
Cathy Paper + Stacy Katsiyiannis11657% games+2.8% vs expected
Andrea Boado + Ann Cadwallader51244% games−7.8% vs expected
Noelle Dougan + Jean Noack044 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Paper + Sara Ormseth224 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Katsiyiannis + Brenda Martinson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Lamparske
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Dana Hansen
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alison Khan
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Stacy Katsiyiannis
65W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4.5
Christine Conner
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Noelle Dougan
25W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Brenda Martinson
12W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
Jean Noack
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Ann Cadwallader
13W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Julie Bowles
56W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Cathy Paper
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Sara Ormseth
25W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Victoria Krauss
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Patricia White
45W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.