Teams

Northern/McDonald/40&Over4.5W

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs HANSEN 40 and FAB 4.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Lyon / Kaelie Breiter vs Cathy Paper / Alison Khan6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Julie Bowles6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Niska / Christie Williams vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Walker / Rhonda Greene vs Andrea Boado / Ann Cadwallader6-2, 6-4
2025-07-07vs HANSEN 40 and FAB 4.5Won 50
W#1 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Suzie Heideman vs Christine Conner / Amy Lamparske6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKaelie Breiter vs Alison Khan6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Lyon / Danielle Niska vs Dana Hansen / Noelle Dougan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Goodrich / Rhonda Greene vs Julie Bowles / Sara Ormseth6-0, 6-4
W#4 DoublesLinnea Benson / Maggie Niska vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson6-2, 6-3
2025-06-16vs HANSEN 40 and FAB 4.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Lyon / Danielle Niska vs Amy Lamparske / Alison Khan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKaelie Breiter vs Julie Bowles6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Humann / Amy Jamieson vs Ann Cadwallader / Andrea Boado6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesSuzie Heideman / Jacqueline Dutot vs Sara Ormseth / Patricia White6-0, 6-0
2025-05-19vs HANSEN 40 and FAB 4.5Won 50
W#1 DoublesAnna Lyon / Kaelie Breiter vs Jean Noack / Noelle Dougan6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDanielle Niska vs Alison Khan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Maggie Niska vs Julie Bowles / Sara Ormseth6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRhonda Greene / Jill Johnson vs Ann Cadwallader / Patricia White6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJennifer Miller / Sara Humann vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Brenda Martinson7-5, 6-2
2025-05-05vs Smiley/Favor '25 (40+)Won 41
L#1 DoublesSuzie Heideman / Caryn Winkler vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Theresa Harich2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Theresa Carlson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Lyon / Kaelie Breiter vs Maura Smiley / Ann Eliason6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJill Johnson / Elisabeth Walker vs Lynda Stout / Kristin Heywood6-3, 7-5
W#4 DoublesPatricia Goodrich / Jacqueline Dutot vs Renae Goter / Laura Nielsen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Danielle Niska
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.64
Maggie Niska
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
4.54
Suzie Heideman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
4.46
Kaelie Breiter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.41
Christie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Amy Jamieson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Linnea Benson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Jacqueline Dutot
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Caryn Winkler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Elisabeth Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Patricia Goodrich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Sara Humann
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.18
Rachel LaTour
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.16
Rhonda Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Laura Keith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Keith + Kaelie Breiter6073% games+12.4% vs expected
Suzie Heideman + Jacqueline Dutot404 matchesnot enough data
Elisabeth Walker + Linnea Benson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danielle Niska
18W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.72
Maggie Niska
23W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.64
Suzie Heideman
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.54
Kaelie Breiter
28W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
Christie Williams
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Amy Jamieson
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Linnea Benson
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Jacqueline Dutot
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Caryn Winkler
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elisabeth Walker
28W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Patricia Goodrich
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Sara Humann
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Rhonda Greene
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Laura Keith
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.