Teams

Team Down the Line

2022 NOVA Combo Men · NOVA Combo 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-06vs CourtmastersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Ryan Curtis vs Jorge Prieto Choy / Rahul Sharma1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJuan Mayorga / Samuel Fontanez vs Stephen Hanna / Louis Dupuis6-3, 6-2
2022-08-27vs Arlington Aces IVLost 02
L#2 DoublesJared Sharp / Samuel Fontanez vs Andrew Han / Richard Gauthier1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Jesse Porch vs PJ Barbour / Justin Lee0-6, 2-6
2022-08-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJared Sharp / Majed Hamawy vs Atul Ramesh / Vineet Velmurugan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnthony Verleysen / Samuel Fontanez vs Jay Kim / Andrew Chang6-2, 6-4
2022-08-15vs Arlington Aces IVWon 10
W#3 DoublesJared Sharp / Samuel Fontanez vs Daniel Hurley / Milin Iyer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Juan Martinez Guzman vs Scott Miller / Vineet Velmurugan6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Christopher Smith vs Anil Khanna / Blake Taylor0-6, 3-6
2022-08-11vs Arlington Aces IVSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Albert Crenshaw vs Milin Iyer / PJ Barbour6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJuan Mayorga / Majed Hamawy vs Christopher Swider / Daniel Hurley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-06vs CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Luftglass / Ryan Curtis vs Sanjivan Sivapiragasam / Gautham Swaminathan6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Jesse Porch vs Mark David / Rohit Munjal1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Robert Luftglass
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Clay Kirkendall
published 3.5
3.03
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Kai Yu
published
Jarrett Ray
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Luftglass
69W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Clay Kirkendall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juan Martinez Guzman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kai Yu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
Jarrett Ray
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.