Teams

Arlington Aces IV

2022 NOVA Combo Men · NOVA Combo 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-16vs CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Han / Richard Gauthier vs Jeremy Pietruszewski / Gautham Swaminathan2-6, 1-6
2022-09-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Leary / Milin Iyer vs Pravin George / Justin Yu7-5, 1-3
2022-08-29vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#1 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Richard Gauthier vs Clifford Hwang / Vineet Velmurugan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPJ Barbour / Milin Iyer vs Ben Moss / Blake Taylor6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-27vs Team Down the LineWon 20
W#1 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Alex Ross vs Clay Kirkendall / Ryan Curtis7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Han / Richard Gauthier vs Jared Sharp / Samuel Fontanez6-1, 6-3
2022-08-25vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Andrew Han vs Ramon Mercado / Pravin George6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMilin Iyer / Christopher Swider vs Blake Taylor / Ben Moss6-4, 6-2
2022-08-15vs Team Down the LineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Richard Gauthier vs Anthony Verleysen / Jarrett Ray6-3, 5-5
L#3 DoublesDaniel Hurley / Milin Iyer vs Jared Sharp / Samuel Fontanez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-13vs CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Richard Gauthier vs Jeremy Pietruszewski / Scott Jacob4-6, 6-6
2022-08-11vs Team Down the LineWon 10
W#2 DoublesMilin Iyer / PJ Barbour vs Robert Luftglass / Albert Crenshaw4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Aaron Thede
published 4
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.27
Christopher Swider
published 3.5
Richard Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lohit Palle
published
Seb Weinhold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Dorsk + Milin Iyer033 matchesnot enough data
Justin Dorsk + Richard Gauthier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Aaron Thede
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Christopher Swider
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Richard Gauthier
47W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lohit Palle
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Seb Weinhold
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.