Teams

Sommers Summer 2025

2025 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 7.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-24vs Carney: Not My FaultSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Nixon / Jeanne Elert vs Shirley Draz / Nancy Yost6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Kristi Kamish-Bushinski vs Susan Stombaugh / Marlys Day2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesTheresa Anderson / Susan Nixon vs Jacqueline Williams / Elizabeth Micek7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Bernstein / Cynthia Brady vs Patti Clifton / Jill Sisk6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline DeVries / Jane Newman vs Kathy Schwalbe / Arlene Grodnick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-12vs Allex: Wayzata World ClassLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Ehle / Kristi Kamish-Bushinski vs Dominique Allex / Jane Casto1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline DeVries / Ann Hawkins vs Amy Gustafson / Shelly Gosz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Kathy Lomen vs Julie Vandenbrook / Cory Borthwick1-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs Moe Bowden Summer 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Elert / Theresa Anderson vs Brigitte Schiller / Sarah Tuel6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Kirk / Mary Henke vs Nancy Koch / Jean Kolstad6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJane Newman / Ann Hawkins vs Mary Cady / Joyce Riestenberg-Smith6-1, 6-1
2025-05-29vs Gilchrist/Gabrielli 55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Ehle / Susan Nixon vs Ann Gabrielli / Karen Heyer-Liljedahl4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Henke / Susan Bernstein vs Carlene Forsythe / Sara Moran2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Sommers / Kathy Lomen vs Deirdre Bombeck / Ann Shronts1-6, 4-6
2025-05-22vs ArnoldLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristi Kamish-Bushinski / Jeanne Elert vs Barbara Buenz / Janet Nauman3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Sommers / Jacqueline Kirk vs Michele Caulfield / Sheila Rodstein1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Hawkins / Kathy Lomen vs Linda Hauser / Andrea Hammer6-4, 6-2
2025-05-15vs Carney: Not My FaultWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Ehle / Susan Nixon vs Nancy Yost / Laura Abraham6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTheresa Anderson / Kristi Kamish-Bushinski vs Theresa Johnson / Marlys Day6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqueline DeVries / Mary Henke vs Shirley Draz / Karen Clark6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Susan Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Theresa Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Jeanne Elert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jacqueline Kirk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Laurie Ehle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Mary Henke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Cynthia Brady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jane Newman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Kristi Kamish-Bushinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Kathy Sommers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Jacqueline DeVries
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Lomen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Kirk + Mary Henke5649% games+1.0% vs expected
Cynthia Brady + Mary Henke4155% games+0.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Kirk + Kathy Lomen0545% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Ehle + Mary Henke213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Sommers + Jacqueline DeVries123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Bernstein
19W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Theresa Anderson
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jeanne Elert
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Jacqueline Kirk
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Laurie Ehle
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ann Hawkins
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Henke
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Brady
12W–13L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Jane Newman
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kristi Kamish-Bushinski
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kathy Sommers
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jacqueline DeVries
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kathy Lomen
42W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.