Teams

Moe Bowden Summer 55

2025 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 7.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#3 DoublesMonique Day / Wendi Stern vs Arlene Grodnick / Ann Robinow6-2, 6-1
2025-07-10vs ArnoldSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCindy Moe / Connie Weinstein vs Mara Rozenburgs / Marcy Chamberlain6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Cady / Nancy Koch vs Michele Caulfield / Linda Hauser6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-03vs ThiesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Tuel / Wendi Stern vs Janet Dunlap / Anita Pfiefer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs Carney: Not My FaultLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendi Stern / Joanie Gold vs Jane Hill / Julie Damico2-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs Gilchrist/Gabrielli 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Tuel / Pam Bowden vs Ann Gabrielli / Karen Heyer-Liljedahl7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoyce Riestenberg-Smith / Nancy Koch vs Marnie Brown Cress / Deirdre Bombeck4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesConnie Weinstein / Daisy Khalifa vs Sara Moran / Sally Gilchrist7-5, 6-4
2025-06-12vs ThiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonique Day / Joanie Gold vs Joan Gustafson / Susan Gullickson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Koch / Connie Weinstein vs Diane Drake / Michele Weddle6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaisy Khalifa / Mary Cady vs Lori Julian / Marsha Fosburgh1-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs Sommers Summer 2025Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrigitte Schiller / Sarah Tuel vs Jeanne Elert / Theresa Anderson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Koch / Jean Kolstad vs Jacqueline Kirk / Mary Henke4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Cady / Joyce Riestenberg-Smith vs Jane Newman / Ann Hawkins1-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs Allex: Wayzata World ClassWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Bowden / Monique Day vs Dominique Allex / Nancy Gunderson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Koch / Jean Kolstad vs Meaghan Mclaughlin / Janet Hansen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Moe / Connie Weinstein vs Shelly Gosz / Susan Breckner6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSarah Tuel / Pam Bowden vs Jill Sisk / Jacqueline Williams6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoanie Gold / Monique Day vs Kathy Schwalbe / Mary Sams6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaisy Khalifa / Connie Weinstein vs Robin Ryan / Debra McCracken6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Pam Bowden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Connie Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarah Tuel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Jean Kolstad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Cindy Moe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Monique Day
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Brigitte Schiller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Daisy Khalifa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Wendi Stern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Nancy Koch
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Joanie Gold
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Mary Cady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Riestenberg-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Moe + Brigitte Schiller5158% games+10.2% vs expected
Cindy Moe + Connie Weinstein9267% games+5.5% vs expected
Pam Bowden + Sarah Tuel6062% games+5.0% vs expected
Pam Bowden + Monique Day134 matchesnot enough data
Daisy Khalifa + Connie Weinstein303 matchesnot enough data
Connie Weinstein + Brigitte Schiller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Connie Weinstein
29W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Sarah Tuel
75W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jean Kolstad
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Cindy Moe
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Monique Day
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Brigitte Schiller
34W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Daisy Khalifa
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Wendi Stern
76W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Nancy Koch
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Joanie Gold
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Mary Cady
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Joyce Riestenberg-Smith
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.