Teams

MLF BRONZE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-14vs TAG REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Walton / Jessica Bergen vs Sandy Chenore / Beth Smits6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristine Mathiesen vs Christy Mascarenas1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Kelly Stout vs Lori Mooney-Malone / Carolyn Gattis6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBernita Sterling / Lora Griffith vs Deirdre White / Thora Pabst6-0, 6-2
2025-06-30vs LT BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBernita Sterling / Kathy Carlson vs Kelley Knudson / Michele MacHado6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelissa Walton vs Kristen Philbrook6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Short / Mariana Treat vs Debbie Stechman / Mary Gabiola3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Jessica Bergen vs Jane Koepp / Donna Taub6-2, 6-2
2025-06-23vs FCCC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Bergen / Melissa Walton vs Tara Delaney / Ashley McLaughlin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristine Mathiesen vs Christina Baker6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Simocko-Smith / Bernita Sterling vs Jana Burns / Teresa Nugent6-3, 6-2
2025-06-16vs TAG REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathy Carlson / Jessica Bergen vs Thora Pabst / Christy Mascarenas6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Walton vs Beth Smits6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBernita Sterling / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Stacie Emarine / Lori Mooney-Malone6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Lora Griffith vs Sandy Chenore / Marcy Sanger6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-09vs LT BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJessica Bergen / Melissa Walton vs Michele MacHado / Donna Taub6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCathy Simocko-Smith vs Kristen Philbrook6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Stout / Lora Griffith vs Cristine Carpenter / Jane Koepp6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Carlson / Kristine Mathiesen vs Debbie Stechman / Mary Rogers6-1, 6-2
2025-06-02vs FCCC PURPLEWon 31
L#1 DoublesMariana Treat / Cindy Short vs Deanna Verchick / Tara Delaney4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Walton vs Jessica Allman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLora Griffith / Geneva Ritsch vs Megan Kushner / Ashley McLaughlin6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathy Carlson / Jessica Bergen vs Rachel Yendra / Jennifer Sbicca6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MLF BRONZE6018615145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Cathy Simocko-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.93
Kathy Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Kelly Stout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Cindy Short
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Lora Griffith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Bernita Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Geneva Ritsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jessica Bergen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristine Mathiesen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mariana Treat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Melissa Walton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernita Sterling + Jessica Bergen2539% games−9.0% vs expected
Bernita Sterling + Cathy Simocko-Smith7456% games−9.5% vs expected
Cindy Short + Cathy Simocko-Smith2356% gamesnot enough data
Lora Griffith + Bernita Sterling224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Carlson + Jessica Bergen314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Short + Mariana Treat123 matchesnot enough data
Lora Griffith + Kathy Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Stout + Geneva Ritsch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Simocko-Smith
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Kathy Carlson
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kelly Stout
29W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cindy Short
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lora Griffith
38W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Geneva Ritsch
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Bergen
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Mathiesen
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariana Treat
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Walton
12W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.