Teams

TAG RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-14vs MLF BRONZESplit 22
W#1 DoublesSandy Chenore / Beth Smits vs Melissa Walton / Jessica Bergen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Kristine Mathiesen6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLori Mooney-Malone / Carolyn Gattis vs Geneva Ritsch / Kelly Stout1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeirdre White / Thora Pabst vs Bernita Sterling / Lora Griffith0-6, 2-6
2025-06-30vs FCCC PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristy Mascarenas / Stacie Emarine vs Tara Delaney / Ashley McLaughlin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDawn Setser vs Jennifer Sbicca6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Amy Herold vs Megan Kushner / Jessica Allman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Mooney-Malone / Melissa Dalton vs Rachel Yendra / Teresa Nugent6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-23vs LT BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeth Smits / Stacie Emarine vs Mary Gabiola / Kelley Knudson6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDawn Setser vs Helen Migchelbrink7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSandy Chenore / Amy Herold vs Donna Taub / Michele MacHado6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelissa Dalton / Marcy Sanger vs Debbie Stechman / Jane Koepp4-6, 2-6
2025-06-16vs MLF BRONZELost 13
L#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Christy Mascarenas vs Kathy Carlson / Jessica Bergen3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Melissa Walton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStacie Emarine / Lori Mooney-Malone vs Bernita Sterling / Cathy Simocko-Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandy Chenore / Marcy Sanger vs Geneva Ritsch / Lora Griffith4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-09vs FCCC PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesBeth Smits / Amy Herold vs Jana Burns / Tara Delaney6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Jessica Allman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandy Chenore / Deirdre White vs Deanna Verchick / Rachel Yendra7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Setser / Lori Mooney-Malone vs Teresa Nugent / Megan Kushner6-0, 6-1
2025-06-02vs LT BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Lori Mooney-Malone vs Mary Gabiola / Debbie Stechman6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Gattis / Marcy Sanger vs Cristine Carpenter / Kristen Philbrook6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Chenore / Amy Herold vs Helen Migchelbrink / Jane Koepp6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Christy Mascarenas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Lori Mooney-Malone
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Beth Smits
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.66
Amy Herold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Dawn Setser
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Marcy Sanger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Sandy Chenore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.47
Carolyn Gattis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Thora Pabst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Stacie Emarine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Deirdre White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Melissa Dalton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pat Sprock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Dalton + Amy Herold4445% games+1.6% vs expected
Deirdre White + Thora Pabst3448% games+1.4% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Lori Mooney-Malone1538% games−2.1% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Amy Herold8744% games−2.4% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Sandy Chenore0735% games−3.3% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Deirdre White3540% games−5.1% vs expected
Stacie Emarine + Thora Pabst1934% games−7.8% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Amy Herold1932% games−9.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christy Mascarenas
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Lori Mooney-Malone
19W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Beth Smits
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Amy Herold
19W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Dawn Setser
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65
Marcy Sanger
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Sandy Chenore
17W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Carolyn Gattis
5W–25L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Thora Pabst
30W–85L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Stacie Emarine
12W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Deirdre White
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Dalton
7W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pat Sprock
2W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.