Teams

DTC SILVER

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-19vs BRMST REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Falkenberg / Kevin Ray vs Jim Piccolini / David Thompson7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBob Bolger / John Cleveland vs Steven Garn / Christian Schulz0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Ehrlich / Andrew Tiktin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-05vs TTA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Tiktin / Terry Wong vs Eduardo Martinez Escalante / Horatio Nelson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Ray / Paul Suter vs Robert Olson / Thomas Waye2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-29vs GTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBenoit Guin / Terry Wong vs Robert Sterk / Stephen Houy6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Falkenberg / James Parker vs Joe Hendricks / Paul Jaszewski2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLloyd-Norton Cutler / William Nelson vs Brian Berglund / Dirk McDermott5-7, 1-6
2026-05-22vs CP NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Ehrlich / Benoit Guin vs William Mahaffy / Kevin Matney3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBob Bolger / Paul Suter vs Kevin Lash / Russ Robbins2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Quinn / Graeme Bush vs Jack Kirtland / Richard Pond1-6, 2-6
2026-05-15vs MC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesBenoit Guin / Lloyd-Norton Cutler vs Paul Whipple / Gary Civitella3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Cleveland / Daniel Casey vs John Longo / David Clark0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJim Vernon / Michael Quinn vs Michael Washer / Raymond Jacobsohn0-6, 0-6
2026-05-08vs BRMST REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Casey / Kevin Ray vs Steven Garn / Kip Stormo2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTerry Wong / Robert Falkenberg vs Jim Piccolini / Christian Schulz2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Nelson / Lloyd-Norton Cutler vs Phil Strobel / Timothy Williams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-01vs TTA GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesBenoit Guin / Lloyd-Norton Cutler vs Shuaibin Lin / Eduardo Martinez Escalante2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Parker / Jim Vernon vs Kevin Davis / Ron Phillips2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Nelson / Paul Suter vs Mark Flanigan / William Wendt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Andrew Tiktin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Benoit Guin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Kevin Ray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brent Slosky
published 4
3.68
Robert Falkenberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Daniel Casey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
William Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Paul Suter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Lloyd-Norton Cutler
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Stephen Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Jim Vernon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Terry Wong
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.35
Bob Bolger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Graeme Bush
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Wong + Stephen Ehrlich224 matchesnot enough data
Lloyd-Norton Cutler + Stephen Ehrlich044 matchesnot enough data
John Cleveland + Paul Suter123 matchesnot enough data
Lloyd-Norton Cutler + Graeme Bush123 matchesnot enough data
Brent Slosky + Kevin Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Tiktin
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Benoit Guin
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Kevin Ray
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brent Slosky
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Falkenberg
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Daniel Casey
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
William Nelson
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Paul Suter
7W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Lloyd-Norton Cutler
77W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Stephen Ehrlich
45W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Jim Vernon
30W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Terry Wong
24W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
4
Bob Bolger
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
Graeme Bush
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Cleveland
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Quinn
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.