Teams

Wild Ones/Chale/Sacramento

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-26vs Menions/Shih/Mountain ViewLost 12
L#1 DoublesMikey Peers / Jeffrey Chale vs Allen Shih / Daniel Lu4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Dorais / Paul Sasaura vs Henny Huang / Chuo-Yun Yang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert DeSousa / Carson Dorais vs Matthew Liem / Jingfan Sun6-3, 6-2
2024-10-25vs DVHS/Nagal/San RamonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Chale / Mikey Peers vs Sumit Nagal / Harish Natarajan6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDana Nuccitelli / Alexander Charn vs Ryan Semmelmeyer / Sridhar Balasubramanian3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDerrick Ross / Robert DeSousa vs Vishy Venkitakrishnan / Amrish Pantvaidya4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-25vs Pain in the Ace/Austero/OakleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMikey Peers / Jeffrey Chale vs Antonio Ambriz / Carlos Manuel3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDana Nuccitelli / Alexander Charn vs Aaron Lee / Moses Reyes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDerrick Ross / Robert DeSousa vs Joel Belangdal / Bong Publico4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Mikey Peers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Dana Nuccitelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.99
Jeffrey Chale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Alexander Charn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Patrick Dorais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carson Dorais
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Paul Sasaura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Robert DeSousa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Derrick Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Lance Chih
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mikey Peers + Jeffrey Chale123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mikey Peers
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.12
4
Dana Nuccitelli
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
Jeffrey Chale
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Alexander Charn
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Patrick Dorais
28W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Carson Dorais
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Paul Sasaura
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Robert DeSousa
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Derrick Ross
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
Lance Chih
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.