Teams

DVHS/Nagal/San Ramon

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-26vs Ruud Awakening/Pias/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSumit Nagal / Chandra Mouli vs Theo Novak / Ryan Stark1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPunyanjan Sen / Suresh Kadiyala vs David Le / Nick Martinez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Amod Ghangurde vs Sean Felder / Sejin Kwag5-7, 4-6
2024-10-25vs Wild Ones/Chale/SacramentoLost 03
L#1 DoublesSumit Nagal / Harish Natarajan vs Jeffrey Chale / Mikey Peers0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRyan Semmelmeyer / Sridhar Balasubramanian vs Dana Nuccitelli / Alexander Charn6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Amrish Pantvaidya vs Derrick Ross / Robert DeSousa6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-25vs Federoar/Zhang/San JoseLost 02
L#2 DoublesRyan Semmelmeyer / Punyanjan Sen vs Cheng Zheng / Shang Liu3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Amrish Pantvaidya vs Ning Li / Paul Xie6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Sumit Nagal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Harish Natarajan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Chandra Mouli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Suresh Kadiyala
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Punyanjan Sen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Sridhar Balasubramanian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Amod Ghangurde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Amrish Pantvaidya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
published 3.5
Ryan Semmelmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harish Natarajan + Sumit Nagal4252% games−0.9% vs expected
Vishy Venkitakrishnan + Amrish Pantvaidya2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sumit Nagal
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Harish Natarajan
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Chandra Mouli
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Suresh Kadiyala
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Punyanjan Sen
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
Sridhar Balasubramanian
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Amod Ghangurde
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Amrish Pantvaidya
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Ryan Semmelmeyer
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shantanu Chakraborty
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.