Teams

Kim Combs W7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-23vs Avari Garcia W7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChloe SOTO / Cassedy Crawford vs Evyn Fairman / Ha Tran0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Myers / Lauren Oelke vs Ella Li / Trinh Nguyen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarla Brooks / Leah Goodhart vs Sue Lopez de Correia / Samantha Calderon1-6, 1-6
2025-08-23vs Jerilynn Fletcher W7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesRanee Owenby / Emily Laurence vs Holly Lewis / Tina Kimbell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Rasor / Misty Carlyle vs Stephanie Hilliard / Bridget Goldman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Combs / Lauren Oelke vs Jerilynn Fletcher / Lisa Douglas6-2, 6-4
2025-08-22vs Kerrie Stephanian W7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChloe SOTO / Cassedy Crawford vs Kelly Musgrave / Lindsey Starnes6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Myers / Misty Carlyle vs Juli Perez / Kerrie Stephanian2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRanee Owenby / Kathie Norris vs Brittany Cole / Ashley Carothers2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carla Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Ranee Owenby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Kim Combs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Chloe SOTO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Emily Laurence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Misty Carlyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Cassedy Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kathie Norris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Oelke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Leah Goodhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Rasor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ranee Owenby + Emily Laurence3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carla Brooks
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ranee Owenby
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Kim Combs
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Chloe SOTO
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Emily Laurence
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Misty Carlyle
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cassedy Crawford
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kathie Norris
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Oelke
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Goodhart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Rasor
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.