Teams

Jerilynn Fletcher W7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-23vs Kerrie Stephanian W7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica DeRobertis / Lisa Douglas vs Dana Browne / Kelly Musgrave0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Lewis / Tina Kimbell vs Juli Perez / Lindsey Starnes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBridget Goldman / Courtney Dowling vs Brittany Cole / Andrea Ivey2-6, 6-7
2025-08-23vs Kim Combs W7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Lewis / Tina Kimbell vs Ranee Owenby / Emily Laurence3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hilliard / Bridget Goldman vs Rebecca Rasor / Misty Carlyle2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJerilynn Fletcher / Lisa Douglas vs Kim Combs / Lauren Oelke2-6, 4-6
2025-08-22vs Avari Garcia W7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTrisha Grimsley / Courtney Dowling vs Ella Li / Trinh Nguyen7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica DeRobertis / Lisa Douglas vs Andrea Gonzalez / Sue Lopez de Correia3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBridget Goldman / Stephanie Hilliard vs Diane Hashimoto / Evyn Fairman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Lindsay Reeves
published
3.85
Bridget Goldman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Trisha Grimsley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Holly Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Jerilynn Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Stephanie Hilliard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Tina Kimbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Courtney Dowling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jessica DeRobertis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Reeves
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Bridget Goldman
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Trisha Grimsley
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Holly Lewis
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Jerilynn Fletcher
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Stephanie Hilliard
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Tina Kimbell
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Courtney Dowling
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Jessica DeRobertis
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.