Teams

DTC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-05vs SS-LT PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Alterman / Linda Feiman vs Carrie Bryan / Carole Dagnon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Jann Peterson vs Marla Roper / Melinda Conover1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Rebecca Wulliman vs Diane Lopez / Bernadette Rottschafer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-29vs HFII PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Laura Saiber Ehrlich vs Gloria Clark / Marcia Whitney6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Yoder / Rebecca Wulliman vs Virginia Foster / Mary Thompson5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Julie Underdahl vs Melissa Owens / Jane Webster6-1, 6-2
2026-07-22vs PRC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Nakano / Jann Peterson vs Linda Manassee Buell / Henriette Nash7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Rebecca Wulliman vs Jaime West / Marcia Nash2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer vs Kathleen Samuelli / Susan Miles7-6, 6-2
2026-07-15vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Laura Saiber Ehrlich vs Cinda Nab / Adele Rhinehart4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Rebecca Wulliman vs Nancy Sharpe / Carol Manlove6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Linda Feiman vs Deborah Miller / Laura Hoganson6-4, 6-0
2026-07-08vs GAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJann Peterson / Nancy Alterman vs Frances Howell / Lana Pierce3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Graveley / Deborah Yoder vs Maria DeFranco / Nancy Quayle4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Jody Hunnicutt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-01vs CACM GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Saiber Ehrlich / Jann Peterson vs Cathy O'Neill / Karla Simons3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer vs Helen Wilson / Kathryn Terry2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Julie Underdahl vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-24vs ATC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Laura Saiber Ehrlich vs Sally Obregon / Caroline Rassenfoss2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Kathleen Andrews vs Martha Solis-Turner / Vicki Devine6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Feiman / Wendy Glazer vs Laurie MacDowell / Charlotte Petersen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Wendy Glazer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Julie Underdahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.13
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Nancy Alterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Linda Feiman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
2.90
Deborah Yoder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathy Graveley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kathleen Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−1.1% vs expected
Wendy Glazer + Nancy Alterman111047% games−1.2% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games−6.5% vs expected
Linda Feiman + Susan Nakano19758% gamesnot enough data
Linda Feiman + Jody Hunnicutt10358% gamesnot enough data
Linda Feiman + Kathy Graveley7462% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Andrews + Rebecca Wulliman4551% gamesnot enough data
Susan Nakano + Jann Peterson5356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Rebecca Wulliman
15W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nancy Alterman
30W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Feiman
52W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Nakano
56W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Helene Grall-Johnson
31W–83L career · type A · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.