Teams

PRC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-05vs CACM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcia Nash / Susan Miles vs Cathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHenriette Nash / Birgitte Sandgaard vs Lisa Barnhill / Inessa McGill3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJudith Racine / Kathleen Samuelli vs Lisa Snider / Paula Broe6-3, 6-3
2026-07-29vs SS-LT PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesVicky M Martin / Lisa Rosen vs Carrie Bryan / Carole Dagnon2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Henriette Nash vs Melinda Conover / Lynne Monnar6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Marcia Nash vs Karen Eagleton / Diane Lopez6-2, 6-3
2026-07-22vs DTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Henriette Nash vs Susan Nakano / Jann Peterson6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJaime West / Marcia Nash vs Kathleen Andrews / Rebecca Wulliman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Susan Miles vs Nancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer6-7, 2-6
2026-07-15vs GAC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Miles / Marcia Nash vs Ann Baer / Frances Howell2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Vicky M Martin vs Maria DeFranco / Nancy Quayle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-08vs ATC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Henriette Nash vs Miki Lorentz / Sally Obregon6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Miles / Marcia Nash vs Martha Solis-Turner / Bobbie Brandon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Racine / Jaime West vs Charlotte Petersen / Christy Brant5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-01vs HFII PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Judith Racine vs Maria Blakney / Marcia Whitney6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJaime West / Marcia Nash vs Mary Thompson / Ann Hugh6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Kathleen Samuelli vs Jackie Nelsen / Maureen Mallon6-3, 6-0
2026-06-24vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaime West / Birgitte Sandgaard vs Janet Swanson / Mary Devine7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Janice Nelson vs Deborah Miller / Cinda Nab6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Kathleen Samuelli vs Joyce Naylon / Patricia Martin7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Charlie Ghidotti
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.29
Marcia Nash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Jaime West
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Birgitte Sandgaard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kathleen Samuelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Susan Miles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Judith Racine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Henriette Nash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Linda Manassee Buell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Vicky M Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henriette Nash + Birgitte Sandgaard4158% games+13.3% vs expected
Marcia Nash + Susan Miles61050% games−0.3% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Linda Manassee Buell61743% games−2.8% vs expected
Judith Racine + Linda Manassee Buell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Ghidotti
131W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Marcia Nash
31W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Jaime West
17W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Birgitte Sandgaard
49W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Kathleen Samuelli
90W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Susan Miles
11W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Judith Racine
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Henriette Nash
68W–128L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Linda Manassee Buell
78W–122L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Vicky M Martin
13W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.