Teams

OC Meta Serve - LPC - Deping

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-03vs OC LLW LNRC - ElyzabethLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusie Xie / Isabelle Krenz vs Pamela Herr / Cindy Tang2-6, 2-6
2023-11-12vs OC Top Of The World LB - MateljanWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeping Liu / Susie Xie vs Sarah Jackson / Kelsey Liss6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-11-05vs OC RCI Sweet Shots - CherylWon 10
W#2 DoublesHuanan Sun / Isabelle Krenz vs Hanlie Alberts / Kathy Doolaege6-2, 6-2
2023-10-28vs OC Los Cab - MargaretLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeping Liu / Sherry Rui Xu vs Nancy Jewell / Francesca Ligman0-6, 0-6
2023-10-21vs OC CMTC - Susie KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesHuanan Sun / Deping Liu vs Christine Ly / Susie Kim3-6, 4-6
2023-10-15vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaLost 02
L#2 DoublesIsabelle Krenz / Linda Yin vs Ai-Vy Nguyen / Emily McKinney1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHuanan Sun / Deping Liu vs Leslie Flower / Tomoe Stevens1-6, 6-7
2023-10-08vs OC MetaVolley-LPC - FayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeping Liu / Jing Dong vs Helen Fu / Cecilia Mai6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeping Liu / Sherry Rui Xu vs Leslie Le / Mariana Chan4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Susie Xie
published
3.29
Linda Yin
published
Anna Li
published 3.5
3.20
Isabelle Krenz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Jing Dong
published
3.07
Sherry Rui Xu
published
3.06
Deping Liu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Huanan Sun
published
2.91
Yiwei Chu
published
Anna Guan
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jing Dong + Deping Liu1439% gamesnot enough data
Huanan Sun + Linda Yin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Xie
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Linda Yin
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anna Li
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Isabelle Krenz
43W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Jing Dong
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
Sherry Rui Xu
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Deping Liu
86W–111L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Huanan Sun
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Yiwei Chu
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Anna Guan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.