Teams

OC LLW LNRC - Elyzabeth

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-09vs OC Los Cab - MargaretWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Chaltron / Pamela Herr vs Amy Ching / Christine Bullette2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-12-02vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaWon 10
W#3 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Jaala Zabrocki vs Ai-Vy Nguyen / Yukiyo Matsushita6-1, 6-3
2023-11-04vs OC CMTC - Susie KimWon 20
W#2 DoublesTami Vannah / Melissa Williams vs Karla Padova / Jane Gee6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Cindy Pham vs Meng-Chieh Lee / Susie Kim7-5, 7-5
2023-10-21vs OC Tustin Sports Park - AliciaWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Tang / Elyzabeth Pham vs Genesis Arreola / Cindy Carpenter6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTami Vannah / Melissa Williams vs Catherine Godlewski / Patricia Cyr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Deb Chaltron vs Maria des Dorides / Cassie Hadfield6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Elyzabeth Pham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Huyen Tran
published
3.76
Tami Vannah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Deb Chaltron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jamie Bland
published
3.58
Joo Han
published
3.57
Jaala Zabrocki
published
3.53
Melissa Williams
published
3.31
Cindy Tang
published 3.5
Pamela Herr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Williams + Tami Vannah8259% games+13.0% vs expected
Tami Vannah + Elyzabeth Pham16167% games+4.7% vs expected
Deb Chaltron + Elyzabeth Pham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elyzabeth Pham
152W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Huyen Tran
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.79
4
Tami Vannah
360W–151L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Deb Chaltron
132W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Jamie Bland
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Joo Han
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jaala Zabrocki
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
Melissa Williams
51W–22L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cindy Tang
19W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Pamela Herr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.