Teams

OC Tustin Sports Park - Alicia

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Trisha Seminoff vs Maria des Dorides / Trang Phan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-05vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Brink / Jannah Carrasco vs Nisha Anish / Eunice Han3-6, 1-6
2023-10-15vs OC RCI Sweet Shots - CherylWon 10
W#3 DoublesGenesis Arreola / Jannah Carrasco vs Kathy Doolaege / Carolyn Chai6-3, 7-5
2023-09-24vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Ann Nguyen vs Sherry Rui Xu / Linda Yin6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Genesis Arreola
published 4
3.57
Patricia Santiago
published
3.36
Karen Brink
published
3.36
Ashley Hay
published 3.5
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Trisha Seminoff
published
3.19
Alicia Callanan
published 3.5
3.16
Ryann Taeger
published
3.02
Tanya Weinheimer
published
3.00
Ann Nguyen
published 3.5
2.96
Nancy Marcosa
published
2.67
Cindy Carpenter
published 3
Jesse Ellison
published
Megan Caporicci
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Carpenter + Nancy Marcosa2449% games−0.9% vs expected
Alicia Callanan + Trisha Seminoff3543% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Genesis Arreola
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Hay
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Trisha Seminoff
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alicia Callanan
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Ryann Taeger
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Tanya Weinheimer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Ann Nguyen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Nancy Marcosa
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Cindy Carpenter
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Jesse Ellison
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Caporicci
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.