Teams

TLCRI-Richards/CSD

2026 Lake USTA Tri Level 40 & Over · Women's Group A 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.96 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-04vs TJYA-Yaudes/McRorie/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Delancey / Dawn Jennings vs Ann Hughes / Jenny Yaudes6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaurie Cleveland / Jamie Krueger vs Cynthia Delay / Brenda Martinez6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Japec / Bridgett Dedmond vs Kathleen Rissberger / Andrea McRorie7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-26vs TJYA-Yaudes/McRorie/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Richards / Dawn Jennings vs Barbara Moore / Ann Hughes6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Krogstie / Jamie Krueger vs Frances Daymude / Amy Ward6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Japec / Kelley Montroy vs Kathleen Rissberger / Melissa Shipman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs TJYA-Yaudes/McRorie/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Berry / Danielle Delancey vs Amy Ward / Cynthia Delay6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Krueger / Rebecca Karner vs Jaime Cooper / Jenny Yaudes6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelley Montroy / Donna Musante vs Melissa Shipman / Kathleen Rissberger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-03vs TJYA-Yaudes/McRorie/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Richards / Dawn Jennings vs Barbara Moore / Traci Dudan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Bibi Muraira / Jaime Cooper6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Finke / Bridgett Dedmond vs Andrea McRorie / Melissa Shipman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's Group A 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TLCRI-Richards/CSD40111470
2TJYA-Yaudes/McRorie/Jetton0411123138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Dawn Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Amanda Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Caroline Pickup
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.07
Christine Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Danielle Delancey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Jamie Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Laurie Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Rebecca Karner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Elizabeth Krogstie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Bridgett Dedmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Julie Finke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Kelley Montroy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Donna Musante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgett Dedmond + Rebecca Karner291158% games+5.3% vs expected
Kelley Montroy + Donna Musante3350% games−0.3% vs expected
Danielle Delancey + Dawn Jennings6079% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Krogstie + Caroline Pickup404 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Krogstie + Bridgett Dedmond213 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Cleveland + Jamie Krueger123 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Jennings + Christine Richards213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dawn Jennings
210W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Amanda Berry
156W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Caroline Pickup
247W–114L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.10
4.5
Christine Richards
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Danielle Delancey
51W–28L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Jamie Krueger
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Laurie Cleveland
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Rebecca Karner
95W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Elizabeth Krogstie
263W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Julie Finke
122W–96L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Kelley Montroy
138W–99L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Donna Musante
353W–176L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.