Teams

TIC Ream

2026 OH OV Tri-Level Charleston · Summer 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-29vs YMCA SweckerLost 02
L#2 DoublesReagan Smolder / Cheryl Spriggs vs Hannah Schoolfield / Robin Shamblen5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ream / Angela Cooke vs Jeanene Plata / Marjorie Swecker1-6, 1-6
2026-08-27vs YMCA SweckerLost 02
L#2 DoublesGretchen Prather / Diana Panucci vs Karen Cochran / Anita Tate4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCheryl Griffith / Felice Joseph vs Jeanene Plata / Marjorie Swecker0-6, 0-6
2026-08-08vs YMCA SweckerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJimmie Baker / Kelli Hinkle Mabe vs Nancy Braley / Kristin Warner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGretchen Prather / Cheryl Spriggs vs Anita Tate / Robin Shamblen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Griffith / Amanda Ream vs Joan Waugh / Crystal Bastin5-7, 3-6
2026-07-19vs YMCA SweckerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGretchen Prather / Jimmie Baker vs Kristin Warner / Caroline Green1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesReagan Smolder / Cheryl Spriggs vs Karen Cochran / Robin Shamblen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFelice Joseph / Amanda Ream vs Marjorie Swecker / Jeanene Plata0-6, 0-6
2026-06-24vs YMCA SweckerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarey Casey / Sharon Seidler vs Shelby King / Nancy Braley3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Steele / Diana Panucci vs Hannah Schoolfield / Anita Tate3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngela Cooke / Felice Joseph vs Crystal Bastin / Joan Waugh1-6, 0-6
2026-06-11vs YMCA SweckerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarey Casey / Sharon Seidler vs Caroline Green / Lisa Hughes2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Panucci / Angela Cooke vs Karen Cochran / Hannah Schoolfield0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Griffith / Amanda Ream vs Crystal Bastin / Jeanene Plata1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Kelli Hinkle Mabe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Jimmie Baker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.59
Reagan Smolder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Sharon Seidler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Diana Panucci
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Cheryl Spriggs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Gretchen Prather
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amanda Ream
published 3
2.51
Angela Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Felice Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Cheryl Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marey Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Steele
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felice Joseph + Angela Cooke4350% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Seidler + Cheryl Spriggs044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Hinkle Mabe
58W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Jimmie Baker
27W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Reagan Smolder
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Sharon Seidler
23W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Diana Panucci
40W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cheryl Spriggs
84W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gretchen Prather
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Amanda Ream
8W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Angela Cooke
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Felice Joseph
10W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Cheryl Griffith
15W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Marey Casey
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Steele
15W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.