Teams

Mejia (Ron Ehmann)

2023 Miami-Dade TriLevel 18 & Over - Summer · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Lisa Simpson vs Katherine Kelly / Samie Lesperance2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Maite Blanco2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristi Atkison / Rajni Agarwal vs Yoandra Perez / Audrey Gayle7-5, 6-4
2023-08-08vs TEAM LOVE ALL!!Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarin Blanchard / Lisa Simpson vs Garvine Recalde / Joann Romney6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDonna Kass / Nina Lindsey vs Beth Pritchett / NATALI SPILBERG2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRajni Agarwal / Kristi Atkison vs Gema de Dios / Margarita Nunez3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Carin Blanchard vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Janine Burke6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCristina Melendez / Rajni Agarwal vs Lucy Hassan / Susan Silver6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs TeamRiviera (Riviera Prep)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarin Blanchard / Nina Lindsey vs Maira Maguire / Helena Maseda3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Kass / Lisa Simpson vs Michele Magoulas / Mira Hashe4-6, 6-7
2023-07-18vs Sosa (Dante Fascell)Split 11
L#2 DoublesDana Hamrick / Lisa Simpson vs Tracey Spiegelman / Maria Ayarra7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRajni Agarwal / Cristina Melendez vs Olga Izquierdo / Dolores Cuquejo7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCarin Blanchard / Cristy Cunningham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Banks / Maria Hulett vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Maria Suarez7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-27vs TEAM LOVE ALL!!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Lisa Simpson vs Bianca Alvarez / NATALI SPILBERG6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Hamrick / Debby Lichtner vs Andrea Leal / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesCristy Cunningham / Maria Hulett vs Daniela Gonzalez / Janine Burke1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNina Lindsey / Donna Kass vs Estefania Lacoa / Leslie Stein2-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs TeamRiviera (Riviera Prep)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCristy Cunningham / Amanda Noboa vs Gabriela Castanon / Laura Herskowitz4-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Sosa (Dante Fascell)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarin Blanchard / Nina Lindsey vs Wendy Sosa / Isabella Ronchi6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Lisa Simpson vs Mariana DeLima-Teixeira / Cynthia Latham7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristi Atkison / Cristina Melendez vs Tracey Spiegelman / Daniela Colarusso6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Carin Blanchard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Maria Hulett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Kathryn Paige Ciano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Dana Hamrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Amanda Noboa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Lisa Simpson
published
3.42
Nina Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Donna Kass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Debby Lichtner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Cristina Melendez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristi Atkison
published
3.13
Rajni Agarwal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julia Banks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajni Agarwal + Amanda Noboa9260% games+12.4% vs expected
Maria Hulett + Nina Lindsey81246% games+2.1% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Maria Hulett684456% games+1.4% vs expected
Amanda Noboa + Dana Hamrick8253% games+0.9% vs expected
Dana Hamrick + Lisa Simpson6449% games−2.5% vs expected
Debby Lichtner + Amanda Noboa368343% games−3.5% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Amanda Noboa3445% games−3.9% vs expected
Debby Lichtner + Dana Hamrick4341% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carin Blanchard
207W–149L career · 5 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Kathryn Paige Ciano
103W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Dana Hamrick
138W–156L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Amanda Noboa
109W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Lisa Simpson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Nina Lindsey
46W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Donna Kass
213W–188L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Debby Lichtner
49W–125L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cristina Melendez
92W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Kristi Atkison
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Rajni Agarwal
90W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
Julia Banks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.