Teams

TEAM LOVE ALL!!

2023 Miami-Dade TriLevel 18 & Over - Summer · 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-08-22vs TeamRiviera (Riviera Prep)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Joann Romney vs Jill Reiter / Maira Maguire6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Valls / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero vs Judy Prado / Mira Hashe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Natalia Guendsechadze vs Tiffany Ortiz / Yuliet Pellegrini3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-08vs Mejia (Ron Ehmann)Won 21
L#1 DoublesGarvine Recalde / Joann Romney vs Carin Blanchard / Lisa Simpson4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Pritchett / NATALI SPILBERG vs Donna Kass / Nina Lindsey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Margarita Nunez vs Rajni Agarwal / Kristi Atkison6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJoann Romney / Bianca Alvarez vs Carolina Rincon / AYelen Gragg2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNATALI SPILBERG / Susie Valls vs Rossana OKAMURA / Michele King7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Margarita Nunez vs Audrey Gayle / Yoandra Perez6-2, 6-3
2023-07-25vs Sosa (Dante Fascell)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Joann Romney vs Wendy Sosa / Mariana DeLima-Teixeira6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Natalia Guendsechadze vs Maria Moreno / Olga Izquierdo7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Joann Romney vs Janine Burke / Daniela Gonzalez4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Margarita Nunez vs Lucy Hassan / Susan Silver6-2, 6-2
2023-07-11vs TeamRiviera (Riviera Prep)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Joann Romney vs Laura Herskowitz / Helena Maseda4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Susie Valls vs Mira Hashe / Michele Magoulas6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMargarita Nunez / Gema de Dios vs Yuliet Pellegrini / Leticia Diaz6-4, 6-2
2023-06-27vs Mejia (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / NATALI SPILBERG vs Maria Hulett / Lisa Simpson0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Joann Romney vs Carolina Rincon / Valeria Ricotta6-4, 2-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Leal / Beth Pritchett vs Patricia Velez / Maria Suarez4-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs Sosa (Dante Fascell)Won 21
L#1 DoublesGarvine Recalde / Bianca Alvarez vs Wendy Sosa / Isabella Ronchi1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusie Valls / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero vs Mariana DeLima-Teixeira / Maria Ayarra6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Natalia Guendsechadze vs Dolores Cuquejo / Olga Izquierdo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoann Romney / Bianca Alvarez vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Janine Burke6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGema de Dios / Maria Debacher vs Andrea Viso / Isabella Ratti2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
NATALI SPILBERG
published 4.5
4.17
Garvine Recalde
published 4.5
4.15
Bianca Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Daniela Rengifo
published 4.5
3.87
Joann Romney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Emma Zapata
published 4
3.76
Heidi Sell
published 4
3.71
Beth Pritchett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Gema de Dios
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Susie Valls
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Andrea Leal
published 4
3.53
Margarita Nunez
published
3.51
3.42
Alison Houtte
published 3.5
3.37
3.06
Maria Debacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bianca Alvarez + NATALI SPILBERG8354% games−4.4% vs expected
Beth Pritchett + Gema de Dios5552% gamesnot enough data
Bianca Alvarez + Joann Romney3444% gamesnot enough data
Alison Houtte + Beth Pritchett4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
NATALI SPILBERG
59W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Garvine Recalde
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Daniela Rengifo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.07
Joann Romney
18W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Emma Zapata
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Heidi Sell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Beth Pritchett
97W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Gema de Dios
297W–204L career · 8 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Susie Valls
118W–209L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Andrea Leal
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Margarita Nunez
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Maria Gabriela Zambrano
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Alison Houtte
36W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Natalia Guendsechadze
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Maria Debacher
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.