Teams

BWEL:BSC Wellesley Red:Egger/Andrieux

2021 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-07-15vs WAC:Waltham:Hoffman/CallevaLost 14
L#1 DoublesGili Bethlehem / Laura Clare vs Mel Barrett / Sherri Cirota3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Elizabeth Bracher3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaola Jones / CLAUDIA WHITELEY vs Michele Finnie / Mui Tran3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Howe vs Talia Hahn4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bardorf / Deborah Mead vs Kimberly Murphy / Jennifer Roy4-6, 1-6
2021-07-08vs LFNT:LFW Natick;WeiWon 41
W#1 DoublesLaura Clare / CLAUDIA WHITELEY vs Johanna Albion / Rochelle Preskey6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Maria Park6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarole de Jong / Gili Bethlehem vs Valerie Wastcoat / Tricia Parmele2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Howe vs Kexi Shang7-6, 3-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Carroll / Deborah Mead vs Olga Sydorenko / Erin Wolin7-5, 4-4, 1-0
2021-07-01vs LTC:Lexington TC:Miller/WeidmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesCLAUDIA WHITELEY / Lisa Broderick vs Kate Miller / Meg McCauley6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Lisa Cacciabaudo7-6, 2-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Cascio / Deborah Mead vs Katsuko Sugiyama / Cecelia Bolognia2-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Howe / Nancy Hines vs Elizabeth Lavoie / Edith Desmond2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-24vs STC:Sportsmen's:Mullee/SealyWon 32
W#1 DoublesDiana Carroll / Gili Bethlehem vs Milijana Beslic / Phoebe Chan6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaggie Egger vs Madeline Wachman7-5, 4-3
L#2 DoublesDeborah Mead / Jennifer Bardorf vs Gayna Sealy / Helene Martel2-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAllie Hale vs Eileen Pollack1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Abeles / Nancy Hines vs Jennifer Orr / Yolanshe Alexander3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-17vs DED:Dedham:Kittredge/HarrisLost 03
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Kim Ton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Cascio / Diana Carroll vs Ann Maguire / Andrea Yanoff3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Herzfelder / Jennifer Bardorf vs Lita Young / Iris Kramer-Alcorn2-6, 1-6
2021-06-10vs WAC:Waltham:Hoffman/CallevaLost 05
L#1 DoublesCarole de Jong / Gili Bethlehem vs Mel Barrett / Sherri Cirota5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Lindsay Cao0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Carroll / Isabel C Cerda vs Mana HOFFMANN / Mui Tran0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPaola Jones vs Jana Dolnikova2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bardorf / Ellen Herzfelder vs Linda Calleva / Kieran Wong3-6, 1-5
2021-06-03vs LFNT:LFW Natick;WeiWon 41
L#1 DoublesJulie Cascio / Cecile Mills vs Stella Wei / Johanna Albion3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Kexi Shang6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCLAUDIA WHITELEY / Paola Jones vs Francesca Manzini / Valerie Wastcoat6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaggie Egger vs Maria Park6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Mead / Isabel C Cerda vs Rebecca Bennett / Rochelle Preskey6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs LTC:Lexington TC:Miller/WeidmanLost 14
L#1 DoublesDiana Carroll / Deborah Mead vs Kate Miller / Lisa Cacciabaudo1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Rebecca Weidman7-6, 4-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Cascio / Cecile Mills vs Katherine Sears / Terese Cefaioli1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Hale vs Rusty Stieff0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Howe / Lauren Abeles vs Elizabeth Lavoie / Rebecca Eshoo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-20vs STC:Sportsmen's:Mullee/SealyWon 32
W#1 DoublesLaura Clare / CLAUDIA WHITELEY vs Kerry Boyd / Cecily Platt6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Rachel Coppola4-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Broderick / Isabel C Cerda vs Carmel Mullee / Gayna Sealy2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPaola Jones vs Madeline Wachman6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bardorf / Lisa Howe vs Milijana Beslic / Helene Martel6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2021-05-13vs DED:Dedham:Kittredge/HarrisLost 23
W#1 DoublesLaura Clare / Maggie Egger vs Elisabeth Harris / Michelle Liang6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Marybeth Liang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCLAUDIA WHITELEY / Cecile Mills vs Lydia McMahon / Andrea Yanoff3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPaola Jones vs Carolyn MacNeill2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Mead / Jennifer Bardorf vs Lita Young / Claire Bourdeau6-3, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Maggie Egger
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.31
Qing Shi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Cecile Mills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gili Bethlehem
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Broderick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Allie Hale
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
CLAUDIA WHITELEY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Carole de Jong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Deborah Mead
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ellen Herzfelder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Isabel C Cerda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Bardorf
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Julie Cascio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Laura Clare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Abeles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Howe
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Michaela Pavlik
published
Nancy Hines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paola Jones
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Mead + Jennifer Bardorf123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Egger
43W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
Qing Shi
42W–41L career · 17 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Cecile Mills
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gili Bethlehem
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Broderick
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Allie Hale
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
CLAUDIA WHITELEY
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Carole de Jong
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Deborah Mead
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ellen Herzfelder
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Isabel C Cerda
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Bardorf
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Cascio
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Clare
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Abeles
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Howe
10W–10L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michaela Pavlik
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Hines
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paola Jones
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.