Teams

Vaughn - NC - Southaven

2025 Adult 18&Over-NC · Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-16vs Qualifying Team - NC - SouthavenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerry Vaughn / Alfredo Ale vs Gerry Logan / Elliott Frank6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNiven Walker vs Michael Duncan6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesROBERT LEBLANC vs Grant Goforth2-6, 2-6
2025-05-15vs Qualifying Team - NC - SouthavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Murdoch / Freddy Ojeda vs Michael Duncan / Elliott Frank6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBryan Howell vs Jeremy Foster6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesROBERT LEBLANC vs Grant Goforth2-6, 2-6
2025-05-14vs Qualifying Team - NC - SouthavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Hardin / Alan Hargett vs Jeremy Foster / Michael Duncan6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrian Quinn vs Adam Taylor7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAdam Casey vs Grant Goforth6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Alfredo Ale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Jerry Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Freddy Ojeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Daniel Murdoch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Brian Quinn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Alan Hargett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Matthew Keeler
published
3.69
Bryan Howell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.59
Adam Casey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.53
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Niven Walker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mark Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Vaughn + Alfredo Ale404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alfredo Ale
29W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Jerry Vaughn
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Freddy Ojeda
28W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Daniel Murdoch
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Brian Quinn
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Alan Hargett
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Keeler
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bryan Howell
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Adam Casey
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Niven Walker
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Mark Hardin
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.